Jump to content


Photo

Wolverine Super 8 Scanner


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Pavan Deep

Pavan Deep
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 371 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • UK

Posted 11 October 2018 - 10:07 AM

The Wolverine Super 8 scanner is pretty cheap and basic and I'm sure the quality is pretty mediocre. I suppose to get decent scans with it one would need a better light source, a better camera and lens inside. Just wondering if anyone has tinkered with this unit.

Pav


  • 0

#2 Bob Speziale

Bob Speziale
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 23 posts
  • Other
  • N.J., USA

Posted 11 October 2018 - 01:36 PM

Check reviews on Amazon, B&H, and see actual results on youtube. There are many negative reviews on the output and on the functioning of the scanner. A major complaint is it only engages one sprocket at a time which leads to jams.


  • 0

#3 Todd Pinder

Todd Pinder
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 62 posts
  • Best Boy
  • Honolulu

Posted 11 October 2018 - 04:40 PM

I thought the biggest problem was compression 


  • 0

#4 Bob Speziale

Bob Speziale
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 23 posts
  • Other
  • N.J., USA

Posted 11 October 2018 - 09:16 PM

I haven't used it myself but the three main complaints were the quality of the scanned movies and breaking or jamming the film due to the one sprocket being used to advance the film instead of three sprokets used on more expensive equipment which caused people to have to rescan many times, and breakdown of the equipment. Also the warranty was only for 200 scans. One reviewer said it took more than 20 tries to scan one 3 minute piece of film. At that rate the warranty would expire after 8-10 film scans.

I thought the biggest problem was compression 


Edited by Bob Speziale, 11 October 2018 - 09:19 PM.

  • 0

#5 Daniel D. Teoli Jr.

Daniel D. Teoli Jr.
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 173 posts
  • Other
  • Born in L.A....NYC is 2nd home...Rustbelt is home base.

Posted 12 October 2018 - 01:29 PM

I scanned this with a Wolverine.

 

nsfw

 

 

Too low Q for me. 

 

Plus it broke after 20 something reels. Then it ate up an important film. Once it starts to squeal, stop scanning or you risk getting your film ruined. 

 

If it was higher Q and lasted 20+ reels, then it could work even as a disposable and still be economically feasible versus paying a lot of $ to get the film scanned. 


  • 0

#6 Bob Speziale

Bob Speziale
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 23 posts
  • Other
  • N.J., USA

Posted 12 October 2018 - 01:47 PM

Plus scenes played too fast in some sections. I wonder if that could be slowed down in the editor to appear to be at normal speed?


  • 0

#7 Pavan Deep

Pavan Deep
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 371 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • UK

Posted 12 October 2018 - 02:28 PM

Has anyone tried to change its camera, or lens?

Pav


  • 0


Aerial Filmworks

Tai Audio

Wooden Camera

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Willys Widgets

Glidecam

Ritter Battery

CineTape

Abel Cine

Broadcast Solutions Inc

CineLab

The Slider

Technodolly

Metropolis Post

Paralinx LLC

FJS International, LLC

Rig Wheels Passport

Visual Products

rebotnix Technologies

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Paralinx LLC

CineLab

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Aerial Filmworks

Visual Products

Wooden Camera

Rig Wheels Passport

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Technodolly

rebotnix Technologies

Willys Widgets

Metropolis Post

The Slider

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Tai Audio

FJS International, LLC

Glidecam

CineTape

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Ritter Battery

Abel Cine