Jump to content


Photo

Animorphic telecine?


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Ryan Ball

Ryan Ball
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 74 posts
  • Director
  • Los Angels

Posted 13 November 2006 - 06:42 PM

It seems like shooting anamorphic would be a better way to get 16:9 aspect ratio than filing the gate and having to guess what's in frame while shooting. Can telecine machines unsqueeze the anamorphic image?

Thanks in advance,

Ryan
  • 0

#2 Robert Houllahan

Robert Houllahan
  • Sustaining Members
  • 1650 posts
  • Industry Rep
  • Providence R.I.

Posted 13 November 2006 - 07:25 PM

[quote name='Ryan Ball' date='Nov 13 2006, 06:42 PM' post='137936']
It seems like shooting anamorphic would be a better way to get 16:9 aspect ratio than filing the gate and having to guess what's in frame while shooting. Can telecine machines unsqueeze the anamorphic image?

Yes most can, Mk3 turbo ranks, ursa, Shadow, spirit etc. can all deal with anamorphic footage.

-Rob-
  • 0

#3 Matthew Buick

Matthew Buick
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2345 posts
  • Student
  • Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Posted 14 November 2006 - 05:18 PM

Can telecine machines unsqueeze the anamorphic image?


Anamorphic Super 8 is unsqueezed on a computer afterwards.
  • 0

#4 Ryan Ball

Ryan Ball
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 74 posts
  • Director
  • Los Angels

Posted 17 November 2006 - 07:10 PM

Anamorphic Super 8 is unsqueezed on a computer afterwards.


That makes sense, Matthew. You unsqueeze it by simply altering the aspect ratio of the digitized file. Now, which anamorphic lens is best suited for getting close to 16:9? Are they all super wide?

Since I don't own a 16:9 TV, what happens to a 4:3 image on one of those?
  • 0

#5 André Bacher

André Bacher
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 23 posts
  • Camera Operator
  • Hamburg - Germany

Posted 18 November 2006 - 07:31 PM

Hello!

Now, which anamorphic lens is best suited for getting close to 16:9? Are they all super wide?

You can use one with factor of 1.33, it turns your 4:3 frame to 1.772:1 very close to the 16:9 format (1.778:1).
There are different compression factors for anamorpic attachments like 1.25, 1.33, 1.42, 1.5, 1.75 or 2.0

Based on the 4:3 Frame:
1.25 --> 1.66:1
1.33 --> 1.77:1
1.42 --> 1.89:1
1.5 --> 2:1
2.0 --> 2.66:1


André
  • 0

#6 Alessandro Machi

Alessandro Machi
  • Sustaining Members
  • 3323 posts
  • Other
  • California

Posted 19 November 2006 - 06:53 PM

I think this is the most logical way to shoot Super-8 for transfer to HD. What kind of screw on "lenses" are available for squeezing the image vertically then expanding it horizontally when transferring to HD?
  • 0


Broadcast Solutions Inc

Technodolly

Abel Cine

Paralinx LLC

Ritter Battery

Wooden Camera

The Slider

FJS International, LLC

Visual Products

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Willys Widgets

CineLab

CineTape

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Tai Audio

Aerial Filmworks

rebotnix Technologies

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Rig Wheels Passport

Glidecam

Metropolis Post

The Slider

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Ritter Battery

Aerial Filmworks

Rig Wheels Passport

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Willys Widgets

FJS International, LLC

rebotnix Technologies

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Metropolis Post

Abel Cine

Wooden Camera

Technodolly

CineLab

Tai Audio

Visual Products

CineTape

Glidecam

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Paralinx LLC