Jump to content


Photo

Camera mounted to motorbike

k3 camera mount motorbike camera mount

  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Gareth Blackstock

Gareth Blackstock
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 148 posts
  • Other
  • Ararat, Victoria Australia

Posted 04 December 2017 - 06:30 AM

Hello,

 

i have attached some images of a 16mm motorbike camera mount i am working on.  i will be using a Bell & Howell 240 with a 20mm lens and a K3 with a Takumar 28mm.  i have a project lined up, and getting some good riding footage will be a priority.

 

i designed the mount to universally fit more than one camera, has an adjustable tilt, and can be raised or lowered, depending on how much leaning there will be.  The mount is attached to a standard motorcycle crash guard.

 

Over the next week i will be fine tuning it before running some film through it see how she comes out.  I am curious how vibration might affect the image, and thats one reason why i am posting this is to see if others have developed mounts, and how they got around vibration.

 

i did a search around the net and saw no D.I.Y mounts, which I thought odd considering that many older camera operators often build what they cannot buy or steal.

 

Years ago I made a bonnet mount for a short, and while in use it jiggled abit, but curiously the footage showed no real jiggle.  so I figured that vertical vibration may be absorbed by the film traveling vertically through the gate, whereas horizontal vibration would be easily spotted?

 

Hopefully I get some sweet footage!

 

And i won't be replicating the early helmet cam either, especially not with a K3

 

 

 

Attached Images

  • K3 close.jpg
  • Kodak 240ee close.jpg
  • Kodak 240ee wide.jpg
  • gopro-1960s-mcqueen.jpg

Edited by Gareth Blackstock, 04 December 2017 - 06:39 AM.

  • 0

#2 Mark Dunn

Mark Dunn
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2734 posts
  • Other
  • London

Posted 04 December 2017 - 06:54 AM

I can't help with vibration, except to say that I'd expect a car to be much smoother than a mtorbike, but FYI film isn't moving during exposure, it's stationary. Otherwise every frame would be blurred.
You can preview the effect of vibration by putting a stills camera in the rig and setting a shutter speed of 1/60.
BTW an Eyemo isn't much smaller than the K3,but McQueen was in a car, so he had some chance of head support.

  • 0

#3 Phil Soheili

Phil Soheili
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 52 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Milan, Italy

Posted 04 December 2017 - 07:26 AM

Hi Gareth,

it's going to be "cozy warm" there.

Might this not actually damage the camera and film?

Maybe never letting the engine run in idle might do good.
Good luck!


Edited by Phil Soheili, 04 December 2017 - 07:26 AM.

  • 0

#4 Mark Dunn

Mark Dunn
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2734 posts
  • Other
  • London

Posted 04 December 2017 - 07:36 AM

I think if his leg can stand it, the film can.

  • 0

#5 Gareth Blackstock

Gareth Blackstock
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 148 posts
  • Other
  • Ararat, Victoria Australia

Posted 04 December 2017 - 03:47 PM

G'day,

Thanks for the comments, food for thought.  Regarding heat from the engine, I will be adding a plate of metal between the mount and engine, it is summer here at the moment with temperatures expecting be climb to around 35 to 40 degrees Centigrade this year. 

 

I am adding rubber mounting and foam tape to help with vibration.  I shall soon see though.

 

cheers, Gareth


  • 0

#6 Gareth Blackstock

Gareth Blackstock
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 148 posts
  • Other
  • Ararat, Victoria Australia

Posted 01 February 2018 - 08:22 AM

Well I got the footage back, all scanned and I must say I am pretty happy with the results.  The film used was expired Kodak 7293, which is tungsten stock, and i used it in daylight without any correction.  The film was hand processed too.  The samples I have uploaded are uncorrected entirely.  I quickly edited them using the editor that comes with Win7, just so I could reduce the size of the file.  The bike footage seems sped up, I was afterall doing around 120kmph.  The B&H is best for the bike mount mostly due to having a full minute per wind, K3 only manages 27 seconds.

 

The Pentaflex footage I am pretty happy with, a few tweeks here and there and I will confidently start a project using this camera.

 

B&H 240

https://youtu.be/WtmHX84aqnQ

 

k3

https://youtu.be/zpkhTULIsek

 

Pentaflex 16

https://youtu.be/wC-C5XScJdo


  • 0


Wooden Camera

Rig Wheels Passport

rebotnix Technologies

Visual Products

Abel Cine

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Ritter Battery

The Slider

CineLab

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Technodolly

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Paralinx LLC

FJS International, LLC

CineTape

Metropolis Post

Aerial Filmworks

Tai Audio

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Glidecam

Willys Widgets

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Wooden Camera

Abel Cine

FJS International, LLC

CineLab

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Broadcast Solutions Inc

CineTape

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Tai Audio

Ritter Battery

Metropolis Post

Technodolly

Willys Widgets

Rig Wheels Passport

Visual Products

The Slider

Aerial Filmworks

Paralinx LLC

rebotnix Technologies

Glidecam