Jump to content


Photo

Panaflex Elaine


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

#1 Carl Nenzen Loven

Carl Nenzen Loven
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 176 posts
  • Student
  • San Francisco

Posted 19 September 2018 - 06:20 PM

Hi there,

Just curious, is there any location that still have the Elaine camera for rental, and if not, for sale?

I heard a lot of bad things about them, but would love to try it out.

C
  • 0

#2 Dom Jaeger

Dom Jaeger
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1817 posts
  • Other
  • Melbourne, Australia

Posted 19 September 2018 - 10:24 PM

There are a couple in London and one in Woodland Hills, but I really doubt whether they are rentable. They probably haven't been used in decades and are either display props or sitting in a storage room. But call up your local Panavision branch and ask. 

 

Panavision don't tend to sell their own equipment, even when obsolete. Some things get given away as gifts or mementos, some are used as display props, some are recycled, but very few things are sold. 


  • 0

#3 Mike Krumlauf

Mike Krumlauf
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 62 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • OG from Chicago, Currently In Denver

Posted 20 September 2018 - 01:02 PM

Panavision does in fact sell some of their older digital cameras like the HD900F. There is a company based in LA where Panavision takes their cameras when they are obsolete and this company in return sells them on ebay. I have seen a total of 6 HD900Fs go within the last year on ebay and I own one of them. These are modified Sony F900s though. I have never seen any of their film cameras for sale and suspect if you ever see one, unless its coming from panavision directly, is stolen.

 

Here are some recent sales of HD900Fs on ebay.

 

https://www.ebay.com...DgAAOSwri5bfWgr

 

https://www.ebay.com...IoAAOSwiXxbfWVg

 

https://www.ebay.com...OwAAOSwfBFbfWcw


  • 0

#4 Adrian Sierkowski

Adrian Sierkowski
  • Sustaining Members
  • 7488 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles, Ca

Posted 20 September 2018 - 01:25 PM

Just curious why you'd want to use an Elaine. It never really was a go to camera for 16mm needs,  and Panavision should have plenty of SR3s, SR3HS, 416s and Aatons


  • 0

#5 Carl Nenzen Loven

Carl Nenzen Loven
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 176 posts
  • Student
  • San Francisco

Posted 20 September 2018 - 02:32 PM

Just curious why you'd want to use an Elaine. It never really was a go to camera for 16mm needs,  and Panavision should have plenty of SR3s, SR3HS, 416s and Aatons


1. Would be fun to learn one more system.

2. Hoping that might be able to score a deal with a camera that NEVER goes out. I got 2500 ft of 16mm lying around that I want to shoot, and it not getting any fresher...even if they are in the fridge...

C
  • 0

#6 Adrian Sierkowski

Adrian Sierkowski
  • Sustaining Members
  • 7488 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles, Ca

Posted 20 September 2018 - 02:56 PM

Probably get as good a deal on any S16mm system honestly (and I would argue there's a reason that particular camera never really went out)


  • 0

#7 Dom Jaeger

Dom Jaeger
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1817 posts
  • Other
  • Melbourne, Australia

Posted 20 September 2018 - 10:48 PM

There are a couple in London and one in Woodland Hills, but I really doubt whether they are rentable. They probably haven't been used in decades and are either display props or sitting in a storage room. But call up your local Panavision branch and ask. 

 

Actually I should correct myself, these cameras were in rental use as recently as 2011, and have also been given to students as part of Panavision's New Filmmaker Program. Whether they are still being used now I don't know.

 

They were designed as a 16mm studio camera system along the lines of the 35mm Panaflex, the idea being that the market for lightweight, handholdable 16mm cameras was already well supplied. 

 

The Gold Coast branch of Panavision here in Australia has one as a display prop in their office. It's a pretty cool object, just like a Panaflex only with little sprocket rollers and a weird mount. There were a range of lenses made specifically for the camera.

 

Panaflex Elaine mount.jpeg

 

Panaflex Elaine lens.jpeg


  • 0

#8 Tyler Purcell

Tyler Purcell
  • Sustaining Members
  • 4281 posts
  • Other
  • Los Angeles

Posted 21 September 2018 - 01:16 AM

They are very funny cameras because the whole point of the 16mm format is the lightweight/small cameras. The Elaine kinda defeats the whole purpose of that with a relatively large camera that shoots 16mm. Now the benefit was being able to shoot longer than 400ft loads without a problem, but of course Kodak doesn't make anything else but 400's for 16mm these days.

I have a friend who used the camera a few years ago and he said it was like shooting 35mm. Heavy camera, lots of loading issues, wasn't very quiet and was more akin to shooting 35 then 16mm. Yes Panavision pretty much gave him the camera (before they moved from woodland hills) but at the same time, there really isn't a benefit to the system anymore.

From my understanding, Panavision has dumped nearly all of their non-panavision film cameras. Yes, I know they still have a few bodies lying around, but they use to have hundreds of Aaton and Arri cameras which are for all extensive purposes, aren't their business anymore sadly.
  • 0

#9 Dom Jaeger

Dom Jaeger
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1817 posts
  • Other
  • Melbourne, Australia

Posted 21 September 2018 - 02:19 AM

Well for studio-bound TV series shooting on 16mm for example, a heavy studio camera wasn't a problem. I think the idea may have been that if you were a DP used to shooting 35mm, then the system was familiar. And you could shoot for half an hour straight with 1200ft mags. But sure, for most other situations it wasn't very practical. I think they only made 40 cameras or so. 

 

When I said Panavision doesn't sell their equipment, I meant the stuff they manufacture. I'm sure they've offloaded plenty of third party gear. 

 

Some more Elaine pics:

 

Panaflex elaine.jpeg

 

Panaflex Elaine 2.jpeg


  • 0

#10 Brian Drysdale

Brian Drysdale
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5287 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 21 September 2018 - 07:13 AM

A friend used to operate on TV drama series using the Elaine, sinbe they were using a gear head the weight wasn't a big factor. Around that time, the Arri 16 SRI & IIs were put into blimps in order to keep the camera noise down..


  • 0

#11 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 20246 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 21 September 2018 - 08:08 AM

Camera assistants hated threading that camera -- all the latches of a Panaflex, based on a Mitchell, but half the size and space for your fingers to do it.


  • 1

#12 Jon O'Brien

Jon O'Brien
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 480 posts
  • Other
  • Brisbane

Posted 21 September 2018 - 07:29 PM

When I said Panavision doesn't sell their equipment, I meant the stuff they manufacture. I'm sure they've offloaded plenty of third party gear. 

 

 

My post isn't related to the Elaine, but in regards to Dom's comment I own an Arri 2C that I bought two years ago, which has a Panavision mount on it. It was advertised as PL mount and that's what I thought it was at first after it arrived but I decided to keep it. I've been thinking of getting the lens mount changed to PL by Bruce McNaughton, but occasionally wonder if it might be worth keeping it as it is. Any ideas how rare these Pan-Arri 2Cs might be, Dom? Perhaps they're quite common. I have no idea. The camera has an F&B Ceco label on the plate that covers the film compartment when there is no magazine fitted, but I contacted the former owner of the company and he had no recollection of ever having a PanArri 2C in the inventory, so the plate must have come from another camera. The camera appears to be in good working order.


  • 0

#13 Brenton Lee

Brenton Lee
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 142 posts
  • Student
  • Melbourne, Australia

Posted 22 September 2018 - 07:03 PM

That Elaine is a very nice looking unit. 


  • 0

#14 Jon O'Brien

Jon O'Brien
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 480 posts
  • Other
  • Brisbane

Posted 23 September 2018 - 08:24 PM

That Elaine is a very nice looking unit. 

 

Yes indeed, I agree. Would love to make a film with this. Pity it's display only.


  • 0

#15 John Salim

John Salim
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 201 posts
  • Other
  • Essex, UK

Posted 24 September 2018 - 06:45 AM

A camera operator friend once told me there were rumours that magazines were prone to scratching film.

Anyone know if this was true ?

 

John S  :mellow:


Edited by John Salim, 24 September 2018 - 06:46 AM.

  • 0


Ritter Battery

Metropolis Post

The Slider

FJS International, LLC

CineTape

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Willys Widgets

CineLab

Glidecam

Rig Wheels Passport

Paralinx LLC

rebotnix Technologies

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Technodolly

Wooden Camera

Abel Cine

Aerial Filmworks

Visual Products

Tai Audio

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Abel Cine

Ritter Battery

rebotnix Technologies

Willys Widgets

Wooden Camera

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Technodolly

Visual Products

Metropolis Post

Tai Audio

Aerial Filmworks

Rig Wheels Passport

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Glidecam

CineTape

CineLab

FJS International, LLC

The Slider

Paralinx LLC