Jump to content



Photo

UK's upskirting law can put as photog in jail for 2 years.

upskirt photography UK

  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Daniel D. Teoli Jr.

Daniel D. Teoli Jr.
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 228 posts
  • Other
  • Born in L.A....NYC is 2nd home...Rustbelt is home base.

Posted 22 June 2018 - 10:39 AM

UK's upskirting law can put as photog in jail for 2 years. More and more regulation unfoldingfor street photogs. This time freedom was only saved by 1 vote. No doubt when the one old timer blocking it dies off the millennials will pass it.

The United Kingdom recently attempted to make upskirting illegal and punishable by up to two years in prison. But thanks to a single lawmaker, the bill hasnt become law after all. 71-year-old Sir Christopher Chope of Conservative party blocked the bill and he didnt give a reason for it

Upskirting, as you probably know, is taking unauthorized photos under a womans skirt. Gina Martin started a campaign against it in the U.K. after she was a victim of upskirting in 2017.She was unable to file a lawsuit because of the gap in the law. Upskirting is not a criminal offense in the U.K., and the police reportedly stated that the photo wasnt obscene enough because she was wearing underwear.

The proposed bill would put upskirting in line with other voyeurism offenses, making it punishable by up to two years in jail. As TIME reports, Prime Minister Theresa Mays government gave its backing to the proposed bill on Friday. However, Chopes objection means that the lawwill have to be debated again at a later date. According to the same source, the expected date for a new debate is 6 July 2018.


https://www.diyphoto...-womens-skirts/


Edited by Daniel D. Teoli Jr., 22 June 2018 - 10:40 AM.

  • 0

#2 Mark Dunn

Mark Dunn
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2839 posts
  • Other
  • London

Posted 22 June 2018 - 10:56 AM

It's not your fault but you have assumed that the reported interpretation of British parliamentary procedure is correct- it isn't.
The MP was objecting to the particular method of introducing a bill to the House. He doesn't need to die and, in fact, supports it.
The bill is, in fact, now supported by the Government.
Private members' bills are the prerogative of individual MPs. They don't often progress without governmental support but the principle is jealously guarded and this is what Mr. Chope was doing- objecting to the Government muscling in on MPs' privileges. Most of the adverse comment came from people ignorant of the process and with an axe to grind.
 
How a law against putting a camera up a woman's skirt impinges on the rights of street photographers I can't imagine. It's not a fundamental freedom- it's a sexual offence.

Edited by Mark Dunn, 22 June 2018 - 11:03 AM.

  • 0

#3 Frank Barrera

Frank Barrera
  • Sustaining Members
  • 477 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles, CA

Posted 01 July 2018 - 12:46 PM

Please explain how this law would impinge on freedom? Because if I am not missing something no one should be allowed to point a camera under a woman's dress without their permission. Right?
  • 0

#4 Phil Rhodes

Phil Rhodes
  • Sustaining Members
  • 12342 posts
  • Other

Posted 01 July 2018 - 01:52 PM

It's a foul and revolting thing to do, but I'm not sure it's really something that's worth a legal action.
  • 0



Abel Cine

Visual Products

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Tai Audio

Wooden Camera

Ritter Battery

Paralinx LLC

Glidecam

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Metropolis Post

FJS International, LLC

CineLab

Rig Wheels Passport

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Visual Products

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

CineLab

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Wooden Camera

Ritter Battery

Abel Cine

Glidecam

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Paralinx LLC

Rig Wheels Passport

Metropolis Post

Tai Audio

FJS International, LLC