Jump to content


Photo

Newbie Shooting in 24p


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 LovinItAll

LovinItAll

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 9 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 24 December 2005 - 01:46 PM

I've shot what seems like a zillion hours of video at 30fps, but now that I have my handy little HD100, I have started experimenting in 24fps. NOW I understand what "stutter" (or whatever one calls it) means!

I know that there is a list of books posted on filmmaking techniques at the top of the forum. Can anyone recommend a First Book that deals with shooting in 24p and the inherent issue of minimizing the stutter effect? Even in relatively slow pans, the resulting footage is a little unsettling. I did some test shots with this setup:

- Tripod mounted cam
- Subject (person) sitting in a swivel chair (no zoom)

Quick swivels by the subject? Where's the Dramamine!

Maybe it has an amateurish look because I AM AN AMATEUR!

Thanks guys (and gals),

Lee

P.S. Happy Holidays! May the new year bring the best to you and yours :)
  • 0

#2 Gordon Highland

Gordon Highland
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 261 posts
  • Director
  • Kansas City

Posted 25 December 2005 - 08:45 PM

if you have a moving subject in the frame that you're following consistently with your pan, it looks a lot better. The biggest thing for me at first was shutter had been set too high. I now shoot most all my 24p stuff with a 1/48 shutter. A little more smearing motion blur helps smooth it out that way. Also, to me the motion tends to look a bit cleaner once it's in the computer and the pulldown has been removed.
  • 0

#3 Peter J DeCrescenzo

Peter J DeCrescenzo
  • Sustaining Members
  • 620 posts
  • Camera Operator
  • Portland, OR, USA www.peterdv.com Blog: http://herefortheweather.wordpress.com/

Posted 26 December 2005 - 08:07 PM

... Can anyone recommend a First Book that deals with shooting in 24p and the inherent issue of minimizing the stutter effect? ...

Not a book, but a helfpul article on "judder", written by Michael Brennan:
http://www.hd24.com/..._the_judder.htm
  • 0

#4 LovinItAll

LovinItAll

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 9 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 27 December 2005 - 07:45 AM

Thank you, Peter. That was a quite worthy read! Quite frankly, that one articled cleared up more for me than the thousand posts I have read about "video vs. film". I appreciate it.

Have a great week!
  • 0

#5 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 20074 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 27 December 2005 - 12:00 PM

Thank you, Peter. That was a quite worthy read! Quite frankly, that one articled cleared up more for me than the thousand posts I have read about "video vs. film". I appreciate it.

Have a great week!


I've noticed that the effect looks worse on the LCD screen of the DVX100, compared to later viewing on a normal TV set. Don't know why unless the LCD screen has a low refresh rate.
  • 0


Paralinx LLC

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Rig Wheels Passport

Wooden Camera

Technodolly

Metropolis Post

Glidecam

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

CineLab

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Visual Products

FJS International, LLC

The Slider

Willys Widgets

CineTape

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

rebotnix Technologies

Aerial Filmworks

Abel Cine

Ritter Battery

Tai Audio

Ritter Battery

Rig Wheels Passport

Tai Audio

Technodolly

Willys Widgets

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Visual Products

Glidecam

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

CineTape

Wooden Camera

Abel Cine

The Slider

CineLab

Metropolis Post

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

FJS International, LLC

Aerial Filmworks

rebotnix Technologies

Paralinx LLC