Jump to content


Photo

Telecine: B&W vs. Color


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 Rene Brar

Rene Brar
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts
  • Director
  • Los Angeles

Posted 27 January 2006 - 02:48 PM

I'm on the hunt for a good telecine house in Los Angeles for my 7222.

I have 2 questions concerning this:

a) Are there specific telecine systems that are better suited for b&w work as opposed to color?
B) Can anyone recommend a place in or near Los Angeles?

Thank you in advance for you input.

-rene brar
  • 0

#2 Rene Brar

Rene Brar
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts
  • Director
  • Los Angeles

Posted 30 January 2006 - 01:35 PM

So, I assume that there are no special considerations if I'm telecineing B&W?

Anyone?

Thanks.
  • 0

#3 John Pytlak RIP

John Pytlak RIP

    (deceased)

  • Sustaining Members
  • 3499 posts
  • Industry Rep
  • Rochester, NY 14650-1922

Posted 30 January 2006 - 01:47 PM

Just remember that silver grains scatter light more than dyes do. So the specularity of the illumination system and sensor system in the telecine will have an effect on the perceived contrast, and on the appearance of the grain. In other words, a modern telecine with diffuse illumination like the Spirit Datacine will be different than an old Rank Cintel.
  • 0

#4 Rene Brar

Rene Brar
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts
  • Director
  • Los Angeles

Posted 30 January 2006 - 02:16 PM

John,

Thank you very much for your reply, but allow me to ask for a further simplification: what qualitative difference can one expect to see between a Spirit Datacine or an old Rank Cintel?

Best,
Rene
  • 0

#5 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 19769 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 30 January 2006 - 02:50 PM

Spirit transfers of 16mm tend to look less grainy than flying spot scanners like a Rank because of the diffused light source for the film.
  • 0

#6 Rene Brar

Rene Brar
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts
  • Director
  • Los Angeles

Posted 30 January 2006 - 03:01 PM

Ahhh... I see. Thanks for the help!

-rene
  • 0

#7 Rene Brar

Rene Brar
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts
  • Director
  • Los Angeles

Posted 30 January 2006 - 09:00 PM

I just got a pretty good quote on a C-Reality.

How would you say this machines does with b&w 16mm? As well as the Spirit?
  • 0

#8 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 19769 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 30 January 2006 - 09:05 PM

I just got a pretty good quote on a C-Reality.

How would you say this machines does with b&w 16mm? As well as the Spirit?


I'm sure it will look great, just as sharp probably, only that the Spirit transfer tends to look less grainy. Now some people prefer the CRT look of the C-Reality and other Ranks compared to a CCD transfer like on a Spirit, but that's a matter of taste.
  • 0

#9 John Pytlak RIP

John Pytlak RIP

    (deceased)

  • Sustaining Members
  • 3499 posts
  • Industry Rep
  • Rochester, NY 14650-1922

Posted 30 January 2006 - 09:47 PM

I just got a pretty good quote on a C-Reality.

How would you say this machines does with b&w 16mm? As well as the Spirit?


Have them show you other transfers they've done from B&W 16mm. If you like the "look", go for it.
  • 0


Willys Widgets

FJS International, LLC

Abel Cine

The Slider

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

CineTape

Visual Products

Metropolis Post

Rig Wheels Passport

Wooden Camera

Paralinx LLC

Glidecam

rebotnix Technologies

CineLab

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Technodolly

Tai Audio

Opal

Ritter Battery

Aerial Filmworks

rebotnix Technologies

CineLab

Rig Wheels Passport

Abel Cine

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Visual Products

Technodolly

Metropolis Post

Opal

Wooden Camera

Glidecam

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Tai Audio

Ritter Battery

CineTape

Paralinx LLC

Aerial Filmworks

Broadcast Solutions Inc

FJS International, LLC

The Slider

Willys Widgets