Jump to content


Photo

Circle of confusion for S16 to 35 blow-ups


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 Uwe Pfizenmaier

Uwe Pfizenmaier

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 16 February 2006 - 09:38 PM

Hey all! In the book Practical Cinematography by Paul Wheeler, it is written that depth of field calculations should be based on a 1/2000? circle of confusion when shooting Super 16 for blow-up to 35mm as opposed to e.g. 35mm for theatrical release at 1/700?-1/1000?. (p.99 ff)
Is that assumption of the circle of confusion true?
Mr Wheeler states that 35mm is about 2.5 times sharper than 16mm film projected to the same screen size. Taking the regular circle of confusion of 35mm at 1/700? and dividing it by 2.5 we end up a around 1/2000?, which is necessary to make 16mm projected on 35mm ?as sharp as? it would have been shot on 35mm originally.
Is that theory correct? Can somebody help me to get that straight? Thanks a lot!
  • 0

#2 Laurent Andrieux

Laurent Andrieux
  • Sustaining Members
  • 1527 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • France

Posted 17 February 2006 - 07:27 AM

Sounds good to me
  • 0

#3 Stephen Williams

Stephen Williams
  • Sustaining Members
  • 4708 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Europe

Posted 17 February 2006 - 08:59 AM

Hey all! In the book Practical Cinematography by Paul Wheeler, it is written that depth of field calculations should be based on a 1/2000? circle of confusion when shooting Super 16 for blow-up to 35mm as opposed to e.g. 35mm for theatrical release at 1/700?-1/1000?. (p.99 ff)
Is that assumption of the circle of confusion true?
Mr Wheeler states that 35mm is about 2.5 times sharper than 16mm film projected to the same screen size. Taking the regular circle of confusion of 35mm at 1/700? and dividing it by 2.5 we end up a around 1/2000?, which is necessary to make 16mm projected on 35mm ?as sharp as? it would have been shot on 35mm originally.
Is that theory correct? Can somebody help me to get that straight? Thanks a lot!


Hi,

That's spot on.

DOF is actually the same regardless of format when you project to the same size, assuming there is enough resolution in the smallest format. You must use very sharp lenses for super 16.

Stephen
  • 0


New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Rig Wheels Passport

FJS International, LLC

Wooden Camera

Metropolis Post

Technodolly

Paralinx LLC

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

The Slider

Ritter Battery

rebotnix Technologies

CineLab

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Visual Products

Abel Cine

Tai Audio

CineTape

Willys Widgets

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Glidecam

Aerial Filmworks

Metropolis Post

Aerial Filmworks

Paralinx LLC

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

The Slider

Tai Audio

Willys Widgets

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Technodolly

rebotnix Technologies

Ritter Battery

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

FJS International, LLC

Rig Wheels Passport

Glidecam

CineLab

Abel Cine

Wooden Camera

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

CineTape

Visual Products