David Mullen question?
Posted 25 February 2006 - 04:53 PM
I have a Canon 814XLS Super 8 camera and I want to put a widescreen mask on the front of the lens. This mask will give the look of 2.35:1. It won't be exact, but it's a test. I'm going to black out the top and bottom of a Cokin square filter (so it will have a roughly 2.35:1 aspect ratio).
Will this cause the image to have less resolution? Anything else I should know?
I'm editing the footage in Final Cut. I know I could put the mask in during the editing stage, but here is why I'm not. For me, I find it very hard to frame (for widescreen) when you are looking thru the viewfinder and you are seeing the 1.33:1 aspect raito.
I know that when I get the footage back from the lab the edge of the mask is going to be soft, that's OK. I'll use Final Cut to put the sharp black edge over the in camera mask.
Posted 25 February 2006 - 05:26 PM
Unless some super 8 camera offers a ground glass that scope frameline can be added to, or has a video tap that a frame line may be aded to a monitor, you may just have to do the best you can and add the scope in FCP where you can also reframe vertically.
PS way back in film school I shot a scope S8 movie utilizing a projection anamorphic lens. I mounted it anyway I could and bascially shot through two lenses. Technically not the best thing to do, but I did a test and got it to work. My instructor liked the hutzpah. The film was OK, but heck I was learning.
Posted 25 February 2006 - 08:42 PM
Posted 28 February 2006 - 12:04 PM
I have a Canon 814XLS Super 8 camera and I want to put a widescreen mask on the front of the lens.
Might it be possible to mask the viewfinder/diopter? That way, you won't be interefering with the zoom problem or affecting the lens performance in any way, and you would still be able to approximate the framing for your desired aspect ratio. It might not be exact, but you could then add the mask in post and not be restricted.
Just a thought.
Edited by Raffi Kondy, 28 February 2006 - 12:05 PM.
Posted 28 February 2006 - 11:25 PM