Jump to content


Photo

Bolex Rating


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Shawn Gallagher

Shawn Gallagher
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 24 posts
  • Other
  • Brooklyn, NY

Posted 22 March 2006 - 11:33 AM

Hi Everyone,

I bought a Bolex RX-4 with a Vario-Switar EE 18-86 from a camera dealer on ebay. The camera was rated EX+ and I paid just over $1000 for it, but when it arrived the diopter was completely broken and there was dirt and fungus in the viewfinder. The ebay listing didn't menton any of this but described the camera as "95% cosmetically", I also spoke to the dealer on the phone and inquired whether anything was wrong with the camera and the dealer said there was nothing wrong with the camera. Since I need the camera for animation and have bad eyesight, the diopter is essential for fine focusing, and therefore I can't use the camera.

My question is: Was the camera misrepresented or is it common to rate a dirty RX-4 as EX+ with a broken diopter?

I am asking because I've dealt with this dealer before and we had a disagreement on camera rating, so I'd like to have some idea of standard rating before I ask for a refund.

Thanks for your help!!!
  • 0

#2 Ian Marks

Ian Marks
  • Guests

Posted 22 March 2006 - 12:11 PM

A broken diopter adjustment collar (funny, mine's broken too) and fungus in the finder should not on a camera rated "EX+" . . . period. I also think that at over $1,000, you're at the high end of the price range for a Rex-4 and 18-86, so the camera should look good and be 100% ready to go to work. I suspect the dealer didn't thoroughly inspect the camera before describing it as EX+. I think a gracious dealer would offer you a refund and an apology (or possibly an exchange via overnight FedEx, if he's got another body that does meet your needs). Of course, this is just my opinion.
  • 0

#3 Shawn Gallagher

Shawn Gallagher
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 24 posts
  • Other
  • Brooklyn, NY

Posted 22 March 2006 - 12:19 PM

A broken diopter adjustment collar (funny, mine's broken too) and fungus in the finder should not on a camera rated "EX+" . . . period. I also think that at over $1,000, you're at the high end of the price range for a Rex-4 and 18-86, so the camera should look good and be 100% ready to go to work. I suspect the dealer didn't thoroughly inspect the camera before describing it as EX+. I think a gracious dealer would offer you a refund and an apology (or possibly an exchange via overnight FedEx, if he's got another body that does meet your needs). Of course, this is just my opinion.


Thanks Ian,

I totally agree, thanks again for your reply. Now that I'm sure I'm not crazy for expecting a RX-4 that WORKS for a grand I can request a refund from this dealer with confidence.
  • 0

#4 Nick Mulder

Nick Mulder
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1023 posts
  • Other
  • Auckland, New Zealand

Posted 23 March 2006 - 06:45 AM

Now that I'm sure I'm not crazy for expecting a RX-4 that WORKS for a grand I can request a refund from this dealer with confidence.


yeh, I think thats a crap deal for something listed as 'EX+' - The dealer may not have looked through the viewfinder and may not have been aware... but should still sort out a refund/replace etc
  • 0


CineLab

Tai Audio

Wooden Camera

Willys Widgets

Visual Products

Technodolly

Glidecam

Aerial Filmworks

Paralinx LLC

FJS International, LLC

Ritter Battery

Metropolis Post

Rig Wheels Passport

CineTape

Abel Cine

Broadcast Solutions Inc

The Slider

Opal

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

rebotnix Technologies

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

CineLab

Glidecam

Paralinx LLC

Aerial Filmworks

Ritter Battery

Technodolly

Rig Wheels Passport

CineTape

Visual Products

FJS International, LLC

Willys Widgets

Abel Cine

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Opal

Metropolis Post

Broadcast Solutions Inc

The Slider

Wooden Camera

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Tai Audio

rebotnix Technologies