Jump to content


Photo

500T versus 250D when shooting INT w/ HMIs


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 George Lekovic

George Lekovic
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 69 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • New York

Posted 23 May 2006 - 12:42 PM

Hi,

So far I have been happy with 7218 for INT and night EXT, mixed with 7245 for day EXT. I'm moving into a production in six days and this crossed my mind:

Woudl I be better fo to shoot everythhing on 250D? I have very little experience with this stock. What are the pros and cons of this approach. A standard HMI package should suffice to give a decent stop inside, and ND filters will help on the outside. Overall it would be Tungsten-less production with a very uniformed look across. EXT nights I would still shoot on 7218.

Any comments are appreciated, as I have to go to Kodak very soon...

Thank you,
  • 0

#2 John Pytlak RIP

John Pytlak RIP

    (deceased)

  • Sustaining Members
  • 3499 posts
  • Industry Rep
  • Rochester, NY 14650-1922

Posted 23 May 2006 - 03:03 PM

Hi,

So far I have been happy with 7218 for INT and night EXT, mixed with 7245 for day EXT. I'm moving into a production in six days and this crossed my mind:

Woudl I be better fo to shoot everythhing on 250D? I have very little experience with this stock. What are the pros and cons of this approach. A standard HMI package should suffice to give a decent stop inside, and ND filters will help on the outside. Overall it would be Tungsten-less production with a very uniformed look across. EXT nights I would still shoot on 7218.

Any comments are appreciated, as I have to go to Kodak very soon...

Thank you,


By all means, if you are using HMI for the interiors, stick with daylight balance film. The "look" of 250D 7205 and 50D 7201 is very similar, but the slower film has finer grain of course. Your decision seems to be whether to keep the graininess consistent for all scenes by using the 250D, or whether to go for finer grain 50D when you have plenty of light. If the slightly increased graininess of the 250D is acceptable, you might find the convenience of having only one film an advantage.
  • 0

#3 George Lekovic

George Lekovic
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 69 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • New York

Posted 24 May 2006 - 01:07 AM

One concern is that if I shoot daylight balanced stock at night - all the night practicals will turn out very warm... Other than that I don't mind using one daylight stock all over.
  • 0

#4 John Pytlak RIP

John Pytlak RIP

    (deceased)

  • Sustaining Members
  • 3499 posts
  • Industry Rep
  • Rochester, NY 14650-1922

Posted 24 May 2006 - 09:21 AM

One concern is that if I shoot daylight balanced stock at night - all the night practicals will turn out very warm... Other than that I don't mind using one daylight stock all over.


I assumed you still planned to use Kodak VISION2 500T Color Negative Film 7218 for the nightime exteriors.
  • 0


Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Tai Audio

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Paralinx LLC

Opal

Rig Wheels Passport

Abel Cine

Wooden Camera

rebotnix Technologies

Metropolis Post

CineLab

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Glidecam

Willys Widgets

Aerial Filmworks

Visual Products

Ritter Battery

The Slider

Technodolly

CineTape

FJS International, LLC

rebotnix Technologies

Abel Cine

FJS International, LLC

Ritter Battery

Aerial Filmworks

CineLab

Opal

Tai Audio

Visual Products

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Willys Widgets

Metropolis Post

Glidecam

Paralinx LLC

Technodolly

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Rig Wheels Passport

CineTape

The Slider

Wooden Camera

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS