Jump to content


Photo

The right codec for a demo reel


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Stephen Whitehead

Stephen Whitehead
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 124 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Toronto, Canada

Posted 11 June 2006 - 12:46 PM

Hello, I am trying to compress my demo reel. it is about 4 minutes long, and I want it to be under 10 megs, all the codecs I am using seem to leave far too many compression artifacts. Does anyone have a recomendation as to the best codec and settings to compress my reel with? also what frame rate would be best?

Cheers,

Steve Whitehead

Edited by Stephen Whitehead, 11 June 2006 - 12:46 PM.

  • 0

#2 Adam Frisch FSF

Adam Frisch FSF
  • Sustaining Members
  • 2009 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles, USA

Posted 11 June 2006 - 02:04 PM

I compress everything with the new H264 codec - it creates the leanest and highest quality compressions of any codec. Only problem is you the viewer needs the QT 7.0 or higher, but most have that anyway - and those few who don't have it are technophobes who still use Win98...

A well compressed Sorenson3 can also be an alternative, bur Sorenson is an old codec now - don't think Sorenson has updated it at all during the last 5-7 years.
  • 0

#3 Miguel Bunster

Miguel Bunster
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 301 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 11 June 2006 - 05:20 PM

H264 is good but I still get problems. It lowers the contrast specially bringing up blacks and lowers saturation as well...
Miguel
  • 0

#4 Michael Most

Michael Most
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 765 posts
  • Other

Posted 11 June 2006 - 06:24 PM

Hello, I am trying to compress my demo reel. it is about 4 minutes long, and I want it to be under 10 megs, all the codecs I am using seem to leave far too many compression artifacts. Does anyone have a recomendation as to the best codec and settings to compress my reel with? also what frame rate would be best?


You haven't stated whether you're on a Mac or a PC, or where your compressed file is going - on a website, being emailed, FTP'd, going on CD or DVD media, etc. All of these things influence what you can or "should" use. My own experience has been that by far the best quality at the lowest data rate is achieved by Windows Media. A good alternative if you're on a Macintosh is H264, but it will require all viewers to have Quicktime 7.
  • 0

#5 Stephen Whitehead

Stephen Whitehead
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 124 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Toronto, Canada

Posted 11 June 2006 - 09:40 PM

Basically what I am doing is posting the file on the web, to be viewed by potential employers. so I think under 10 megs is pretty important.
  • 0

#6 Chad Stockfleth

Chad Stockfleth
  • Sustaining Members
  • 622 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Louisville, KY

Posted 11 June 2006 - 10:07 PM

I've had decent luck exporting quicktimes into compressor and using Mpeg-1 for the web.

4 minutes is a bit long for a demo reel... if you could cut it down a bit...say 2 minutes, then you could certainly get a higher quality/lower-res file.
  • 0


rebotnix Technologies

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Aerial Filmworks

Rig Wheels Passport

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Technodolly

Willys Widgets

Visual Products

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Tai Audio

Glidecam

Wooden Camera

CineLab

CineTape

Abel Cine

The Slider

FJS International, LLC

Metropolis Post

Opal

Ritter Battery

Paralinx LLC

Technodolly

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Visual Products

Rig Wheels Passport

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Wooden Camera

Metropolis Post

Willys Widgets

Aerial Filmworks

The Slider

Abel Cine

Ritter Battery

Opal

CineTape

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Tai Audio

Glidecam

FJS International, LLC

CineLab

Paralinx LLC

rebotnix Technologies