Jump to content


Photo

Fuji vs. Kodak 500


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Gary Robinson

Gary Robinson
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 54 posts
  • Producer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 24 June 2006 - 07:14 PM

I just got back from the Cine Gear expo in LA. I saw a pretty impressive demo of the new Eterna stocks from Fuji (kudos to David Mullen who was mentioned in the presentation) even though the projector was having focus problems. Between the new Fuji stock and the newest Kodak stock, which 500 speed do you think has the least grain?
  • 0

#2 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 20068 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 24 June 2006 - 09:19 PM

The only direct comparison test I've seen was shot by Allen Daviau, between Eterna 500T and Kodak 5218, of a model's face. They were rather close, but I'd say that the Eterna was slightly LESS grainy, aka smoother looking -- but it was also somewhat softer and lower in contrast. But honestly they were rather close in graininess. Some would prefer the sharpness and better blacks of the Kodak, whereas someone else may prefer the "creamier" look of the Eterna 500T. For Super-16, I'd lean towards '18 over Eterna just because Super-16 needs to snap.
  • 0

#3 steve hyde

steve hyde
  • Sustaining Members
  • 446 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Seattle

Posted 26 June 2006 - 03:17 PM

The only direct comparison test I've seen was shot by Allen Daviau, between Eterna 500T and Kodak 5218, of a model's face. They were rather close, but I'd say that the Eterna was slightly LESS grainy, aka smoother looking -- but it was also somewhat softer and lower in contrast. But honestly they were rather close in graininess. Some would prefer the sharpness and better blacks of the Kodak, whereas someone else may prefer the "creamier" look of the Eterna 500T. For Super-16, I'd lean towards '18 over Eterna just because Super-16 needs to snap.


...interesting. How might the Reala 500D compare? I love the Kodak 7218, but I'm currently considering Fuji Relia 500D for use in the Amazon rainforest. (lots of contrasty conditions under canopy and dark) I'm thinking Relia 500D rated at EI 250 might be the stock of choice and I'm planning to shoot some test rolls in the near future.

I'm curious to see examples and hear about experiences with Fuji Reala 500D (8692)

So in this shooting situation (Amazon rainforest) what would be the pros and cons of choosing Fuji 500 or Kodak 500?


Steve

Edited by steve hyde, 26 June 2006 - 03:20 PM.

  • 0

#4 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 20068 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 26 June 2006 - 04:41 PM

Some people swear by the stuff, but I find Reala 500D to be too soft and grainy for most applications except maybe a period movie where you want that texture, or for a faux documentary look in 35mm, or a high-contrast lighting situation where the deeps shadows and strong key will keep the image from looking too soft or grainy.

And to me, the current normal contrast stocks like Kodak 18 or Fuji Eterna 500T already have enough latitude.

Since you are shooting in Super-16, I'd try and use the new Fuji Eterna 250D or Kodak '05 for jungle stuff myself, but if you really need 500 ASA, the question would be whether it would be better to shoot with Reala 500D, or shoot on a 500T stock without the 85B filter (maybe just an LLD filter) and color-correct later, or push the 250D stocks. Seems like something to test.

Eventually Fuji will probably get around to updating 500D into an Eterna version, maybe next year after Eterna 64D and 125T come out...
  • 0

#5 steve hyde

steve hyde
  • Sustaining Members
  • 446 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Seattle

Posted 26 June 2006 - 06:07 PM

Thanks David.

This makes sense. In the end I imagine I will stick with the Vision 2 Kodak stocks just because I know what to expect from them.. I've not tried it, but I imagine the Kodak 7205 pushed one stop would be fine too...

Steve
  • 0

#6 John Pytlak RIP

John Pytlak RIP

    (deceased)

  • Sustaining Members
  • 3499 posts
  • Industry Rep
  • Rochester, NY 14650-1922

Posted 28 June 2006 - 10:23 AM

Thanks David.

This makes sense. In the end I imagine I will stick with the Vision 2 Kodak stocks just because I know what to expect from them.. I've not tried it, but I imagine the Kodak 7205 pushed one stop would be fine too...

Steve


For daylight, 7205 probably has a slight edge over 7218 for graininess, especially if you don't have to underexpose or push.
  • 0


Metropolis Post

Paralinx LLC

Aerial Filmworks

Glidecam

The Slider

Abel Cine

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Technodolly

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

rebotnix Technologies

Wooden Camera

CineLab

FJS International, LLC

CineTape

Willys Widgets

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Tai Audio

Ritter Battery

Rig Wheels Passport

Visual Products

Metropolis Post

FJS International, LLC

Aerial Filmworks

The Slider

Tai Audio

Wooden Camera

Visual Products

CineTape

Ritter Battery

Abel Cine

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Willys Widgets

Technodolly

Glidecam

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Paralinx LLC

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

CineLab

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Rig Wheels Passport

rebotnix Technologies