Jump to content


Photo

MOS camera?


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 william everett

william everett
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 25 posts
  • Director

Posted 03 July 2006 - 09:29 AM

On a related topic, is there such a thing as an MOS camera (35mm or 16mm) separate from a regular camera, or is basically every camera MOS?

Edited by williameverett, 03 July 2006 - 09:30 AM.

  • 0

#2 Stephen Williams

Stephen Williams
  • Sustaining Members
  • 4708 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Europe

Posted 03 July 2006 - 10:21 AM

On a related topic, is there such a thing as an MOS camera (35mm or 16mm) separate from a regular camera, or is basically every camera MOS?


Hi,

Mit Out Sound! A MOS camera is not quiet & can not be used for sync sound unless placed in a Blimp.

Stephen
  • 0

#3 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 19759 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 03 July 2006 - 10:33 AM

Yes, even though any camera can have a crystal-sync motor, an MOS camera does not run quietly enough for sound recording.

An Arri-435, Arri-III, Arri-2C, Arri-235 are considered MOS cameras but the Arri-BL's, Arri-535's, Arricam LT and ST, etc. are considered sound cameras, even though some sound cameras get a little noisy and some MOS cameras are almost quiet enough for sound shooting (especially with a blimp.)
  • 0

#4 Richard Boddington

Richard Boddington
  • Sustaining Members
  • 5482 posts
  • Director

Posted 03 July 2006 - 03:25 PM

"Mit Out Sound" Stephen?

I have heard that legend but I think MOS stands for Minus Optical Stripe :)

R,
  • 0

#5 Matthew Buick

Matthew Buick
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2345 posts
  • Student
  • Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Posted 03 July 2006 - 03:59 PM

Is there anyway to shut an ARRI 16S/B up without an expensive and heavy blimp?
  • 0

#6 william everett

william everett
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 25 posts
  • Director

Posted 03 July 2006 - 06:54 PM

Okay, let's try this again.

I am shooting a silent film so it doesn't matter if the camera makes noise; is there a difference between an MOS camera and a regular camera? Is there an advantage, such as price or number of technicians needed....

Edited by williameverett, 03 July 2006 - 06:55 PM.

  • 0

#7 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 19759 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 03 July 2006 - 07:03 PM

The features tend to be camera specific in terms of weight, ease of handholding, how bright the viewfinder is. An old MOS camera like an Arri-2C tends to be cheaper, but it is also more awkward to operate, having a fixed position viewfinder. And the mag sit on top, making handholding awkward.

The Arri-435 is MOS and pretty expensive, does everything but make breakfast for you, but it's not a good handheld camera compared to the new Arri-235.

You have to just look at the individual features, like does it have a crystal sync motor? At what speeds is it crystal? Is the viewfinder bright enough? etc.
  • 0

#8 Stuart McCammon

Stuart McCammon
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 139 posts
  • Producer
  • 95010

Posted 04 July 2006 - 01:48 AM

"Mit Out Sound" Stephen?

I have heard that legend but I think MOS stands for Minus Optical Stripe :)

R,


Only in Boddywood)
  • 0


Ritter Battery

Visual Products

Opal

Rig Wheels Passport

The Slider

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

rebotnix Technologies

Technodolly

FJS International, LLC

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

CineTape

Aerial Filmworks

CineLab

Wooden Camera

Glidecam

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Metropolis Post

Abel Cine

Tai Audio

Willys Widgets

Paralinx LLC

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Metropolis Post

Rig Wheels Passport

CineLab

The Slider

Aerial Filmworks

Technodolly

Opal

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Glidecam

Paralinx LLC

rebotnix Technologies

Abel Cine

CineTape

Tai Audio

Visual Products

Ritter Battery

Willys Widgets

Wooden Camera

FJS International, LLC