Jump to content


why the mild shake?!


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 rajavel

rajavel
  • Guests

Posted 25 July 2006 - 02:26 PM

hi all
one of the shots in a scene in my recently shot feature film.....has a mild shake....meaning ...
a repetitive up and down movement of the image on the film.....i feel there might have been
a problem in the camera at the time of exposing that scene.....what could it be??
is it pin register problem or what??? anyone ..please explain in detail.

camera - Arri 3, shot at 24 fps, normal shutter, day scene.
format - anamorphic , lens-cineovision 24 mm

thanks
cheers!
  • 0

#2 Max Jacoby

Max Jacoby
  • Sustaining Members
  • 2955 posts
  • Other

Posted 25 July 2006 - 05:27 PM

That sounds like either a problem of the camera or of the post production (telecine or print).

On a side note, I have heard of but never seen these anamorphic Cineovision lenses. As far as I gather they are Japanese. Would you have any more details, like focal lenghts, weight and stop, as well as how they compare to other anamorphic lenses?
  • 0

#3 Stephen Williams

Stephen Williams
  • Sustaining Members
  • 4708 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Europe

Posted 26 July 2006 - 04:03 AM

hi all
one of the shots in a scene in my recently shot feature film.....has a mild shake....meaning ...
a repetitive up and down movement of the image on the film.....i feel there might have been
a problem in the camera at the time of exposing that scene.....what could it be??
is it pin register problem or what??? anyone ..please explain in detail.

camera - Arri 3, shot at 24 fps, normal shutter, day scene.
format - anamorphic , lens-cineovision 24 mm

thanks
cheers!



Hi,

You need to do a double exposure steady test with the camera. Remenber the Arri III has only 1 registration pin and won't be as steady as a camera with dual pins.

Stephen
  • 0

#4 freddie bonfanti

freddie bonfanti
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 315 posts
  • Gaffer
  • LONDON

Posted 26 July 2006 - 04:16 AM

That sounds like either a problem of the camera or of the post production (telecine or print).

On a side note, I have heard of but never seen these anamorphic Cineovision lenses. As far as I gather they are Japanese. Would you have any more details, like focal lenghts, weight and stop, as well as how they compare to other anamorphic lenses?




funny you said that, a japanese dop i worked with two days ago told me about them...i did a google and i found this. apparently theyre not longer being manufactured

http://www.cineused....Anamorphic1.htm

hope it helps
  • 0

#5 freddie bonfanti

freddie bonfanti
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 315 posts
  • Gaffer
  • LONDON

Posted 26 July 2006 - 04:28 AM

sorry,

its a long page and i forgot to mention that the part about the lenses is in the middle...i just past it here, there is not much to read anyway



"Cineovision 2.35 (Japanese) Anamorphic prime lenses. No longer manufactured. PL mount. Excellent quality. In the last 10 years, I have seen one set sold used. The buyer bought them for the glass and had the mechanic's and barreling reworked. The new prices are... 24mm T 1.4, $ 32,000. 32mm T 1.4, $ 25,000. 40mm T 1.4, $ 25,000. 50mm T 1.4, $ 25,000. 100mm T 2.6, $ 25,000."
  • 0

#6 Max Jacoby

Max Jacoby
  • Sustaining Members
  • 2955 posts
  • Other

Posted 26 July 2006 - 06:24 AM

Thanks, I'd forgotten about that page. I'm curious what kind of glass is in there, maybe Canon?

The recent British film 'The Great Ecxtasy of Robert Carmichael' was shot on them.
  • 0

#7 Brandon Robinson

Brandon Robinson
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 20 posts
  • Other
  • Flatiron District New York, NY

Posted 29 July 2006 - 10:48 PM

This can be fixed pretty easily just so you know. We have had to do this in the past at my company, but we rent cameras and use various telecine places, so for us it was not worth looking into 'how it happened', but if this is your cam, you might have a problem
  • 0

#8 Stephen Williams

Stephen Williams
  • Sustaining Members
  • 4708 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Europe

Posted 30 July 2006 - 03:53 AM

This can be fixed pretty easily just so you know.


Hi,

A stabilised image will be noticeably softer. Far better to have a steady camera + scanner.

Stephen
  • 0

#9 Thomas Clay

Thomas Clay

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts
  • Director

Posted 27 September 2006 - 12:14 PM

Hi... Yes, we used the Cineovision lenses on Carmichael. We used them for their cold and stark yet slightly soft look - what one might call a "70s look". The main problem with the lenses is that you get some slight vinguetting, with a loss of focus around the edges under certain lighting conditions.
  • 0


Ritter Battery

Abel Cine

The Slider

Wooden Camera

Willys Widgets

Broadcast Solutions Inc

FJS International, LLC

Tai Audio

CineTape

Aerial Filmworks

Visual Products

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

rebotnix Technologies

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Metropolis Post

Paralinx LLC

Technodolly

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

CineLab

Rig Wheels Passport

Glidecam

Willys Widgets

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Tai Audio

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

CineLab

Visual Products

Ritter Battery

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

FJS International, LLC

Glidecam

Metropolis Post

The Slider

rebotnix Technologies

Rig Wheels Passport

Wooden Camera

CineTape

Aerial Filmworks

Paralinx LLC

Abel Cine

Technodolly