For example anamorphic cinematography create a longer horizontal streak than spherical lenses and etc?
I wanted to ask too See if I am missing something which I am sure is the case in your opinion about the basic characteristics of the following formats and aspects ratio (not film emulsions). These is a pretty deep and subjective question but ideally including artistic decisions. For example some people wouldn?t use anamorphic for a movie based on dialogue where the director wants a lot of two shots in medium body framing. Other would. Just want to hear your opinions on both subjects artistically and on the technical level.
Well if you feel like it here are the ones?
On 35mm: 1.33, 1.85, 2.39 (anamorphic and DI pull)
16mm 1.33, 1,78
DV and HD 16/9
And curios about a specific thing. If one was planing to make a 2.39 aspect ratio movie using DV ( I know quality would be bad) would you use in cheaper cameras the 16/9 mode or the 4/3 and crop more there? What would be your consideration on lenses considering whi wide angle you had to go?
Well if any feels like taking the time I would deeply appreciate it.
Edited by Miguel Teitelboim, 03 August 2006 - 12:08 AM.