Jump to content


Photo

fuji RP 72161 B/W neagtive


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 andres victorero

andres victorero
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 412 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Spain

Posted 20 August 2006 - 12:28 PM

I just bought (second hand, unopened) some cans of this fuji stock (RP 72161)

someone has shot with this stock?
I think that it´s a 80D asa is this correct?
someone try to push one stop?

thanks
  • 0

#2 Dirk DeJonghe

Dirk DeJonghe
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 612 posts
  • Industry Rep
  • Kortrijk,Belgium

Posted 20 August 2006 - 01:11 PM

Ask your lab to do a sensitometric test to determine the processing time. In my experience this stock needs to be processed much longer than 7222 to get a nominal 0.65 gamma. After having established the proper processing time and if the stock is not too old, do an exposure test. I don't hink there are machine readable Keykodes either, but this may have changed.
  • 0

#3 Brian Pritchard

Brian Pritchard
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 330 posts
  • Other
  • Rushden UK

Posted 20 August 2006 - 01:31 PM

I just bought (second hand, unopened) some cans of this fuji stock (RP 72161)

someone has shot with this stock?
I think that it´s a 80D asa is this correct?
someone try to push one stop?

thanks

Hello Andres
72161 is Fuji 16mm Panchromatic Negative RP film, it has an exposure rating of 80ASA daylight and 64ASA to Tungsten. Although I have no experience with pushing this film, I would not think that there is any problem with doing so. The datasheet says that it is for normal or high temperature processing.
Brian
  • 0

#4 John Pytlak RIP

John Pytlak RIP

    (deceased)

  • Sustaining Members
  • 3499 posts
  • Industry Rep
  • Rochester, NY 14650-1922

Posted 21 August 2006 - 12:14 PM

As with any "second hand" stock, pretesting with your lab is highly advised.

It is listed as EI 80 daylight, and EI 64 tungsten.

As noted, you may need to change the process time/temperature to get the desired gamma (contrast) in the commonly run D-96 B&W negative process.
  • 0

#5 hoyte

hoyte
  • Guests

Posted 21 August 2006 - 12:42 PM

I got a few cans to test it a couple of months ago: Should be rated at 80asa, but someone advised me to actually rate it to 100 ASA which I also did: I only saw it on the scanner, but I really liked the fine, but still visible sandy grain... It was still very tweakable and soft, rated at 100 asa... feels a bit cleaner then Kodak B/W, therefore I like the Kodak better:)

hoyte
  • 0

#6 Graham Lockey

Graham Lockey
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts
  • Other

Posted 08 November 2007 - 01:17 PM

Can anyone tell me if the technical spec for this stock is available anywhere?
  • 0


Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Ritter Battery

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Technodolly

The Slider

Visual Products

Wooden Camera

Broadcast Solutions Inc

CineTape

Abel Cine

Rig Wheels Passport

CineLab

Paralinx LLC

Glidecam

Metropolis Post

FJS International, LLC

Willys Widgets

Tai Audio

Aerial Filmworks

rebotnix Technologies

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Rig Wheels Passport

Ritter Battery

Technodolly

Aerial Filmworks

CineTape

Abel Cine

Glidecam

The Slider

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

rebotnix Technologies

Willys Widgets

FJS International, LLC

Visual Products

Metropolis Post

CineLab

Tai Audio

Paralinx LLC

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Wooden Camera