QUOTE (David Mullen ASC @ Aug 27 2006, 07:44 PM)

Unless you're talking about hand-cranking the camera for a Silent Era look, an old Mitchell or a modern Arri-SR3 are not going to look any different in terms of the picture they create -- what matters are the LENSES and the FILM STOCK if you're trying to emulate old footage, unless you are talking about the hand-cranked era.
And if you want an old fashioned look, are slightly jumpy shots, get an old Keysotone or simalar home movie camera. With its old prewar lens. If the lens is not shaded it will flare great! (I have proved this to myself in justifing the purchase of a B&H Cooke 1 Inch lens.
MAny of the camera of that era have variable speeds, none of which is actually 24 FPS, so that will also add to the look.
If you want a prop, shoot a prop and hide the Keystone inside. Heck a Devry looks like an old camera, just fake a magazine on the top, and paint the camara black/grey.
The FOMA B&W reversal can be abused to look like film that came out of a field developing kit.
Rember that most of these old camera do need double perf film.
QUOTE (Christian Blas @ Aug 27 2006, 05:19 PM)

This feature I am planning to feature with 16mm and it has to do with the alternate past. I want it to seem like a documentory/TV news type of feature that has to do with a fictional war, so I decided to use newsreel cameras like the Mitchell 16mm. But questions come up when I see this camera...
The other thought is that Filmos were often used a s newreel/ war cameras. they are even generaly painted alive drab. Stick a Wolensak (sp) on one and it will look good in your shot, and what you shoot will look very newsrealy. Use FOMA R-100 and the fiilm will look not too far from what you could get in 1934.
I just put a picture of some double perf stock in the atricle on Wikipedia on 16mm film, it was shot on the Foma. it sows a couple of my dogs chasing eah other...