Jump to content


Photo

the images...


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 jan von krogh

jan von krogh
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 454 posts
  • Producer

Posted 12 September 2006 - 11:17 PM

i and the companions at laguun here saw the footage of red at ibc. Simply fantastic.

after 17 years of 35 mil, 9 year mainly 35 mil, i have to admit, to say...

that these images were the best i´ve ever seen from any kind of source so far.

no grain (35 mil disease)
no banding (digital disease)
a very high dynamic range.. quite higher than the usual 35/cinealta we have here.
resolution beyond anything we had here so far, and that includes some a-budget full feature films.

i think that the claims "these images were 3d renderings" speak for themselves... as compliment.

i can cleary say, that the images, which certain members of this so respected bboard are claiming to be rendered, are _not_ 3d.

why? they are to imperfect. I would like to underline a certain aspect: when our partners at getty images and corbes saw some specially produced footage they had the same feeling abou the shots. bigger than life.

from here in berlin: cheers, red-team, you did awesome work. we expected cameras of this quality level for moving images not within the next 4-5 years.

so, we are forced to overthink our 35mil/cinealta strategy... and are happy about it.
  • 0

#2 Patrizio De Sica

Patrizio De Sica
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 185 posts
  • Director

Posted 13 September 2006 - 02:14 AM

Thank you for your report. After reading your post and the helpful information given by Emanuel, I'm sold. Thank you to both.
  • 0

#3 Emanuel A Guedes

Emanuel A Guedes
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 528 posts
  • Producer

Posted 16 September 2006 - 12:36 PM

Here is a real report and here are good, excellent news!

Grateful,
Emanuel
  • 0

#4 Leo Anthony Vale

Leo Anthony Vale
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2010 posts
  • Other
  • Pittsburgh PA

Posted 16 September 2006 - 12:57 PM

Thank you for your report. After reading your post and the helpful information given by Emanuel, I'm sold. Thank you to both.


---Sarcasm?
  • 0

#5 Patrizio De Sica

Patrizio De Sica
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 185 posts
  • Director

Posted 16 September 2006 - 02:36 PM

---Sarcasm?

Not at all!

Follow my posts and you will see what I'm thinking about these jerks... The words aren't mine!

Mathieu Kassovitz answering to David Mullen at dvinfo.net ( it was Emanuel who posted before in this his input http://www.cinematog...n...st&p=124894 ) :

http://www.dvinfo.ne...?t=74235&page=3


I think he's referring to what happened over these pages:

Once upon a time there was a Pope. His name was Jim Murdoch. But this was a fake account from a fake and not real name. The worst was: there is a real Jim Murdoch. And his face confers but it seems he wasn't the man beyond the posts of this account. The rest is what MK called as "the jerks". Again: the adjective isn't mine.


You can also follow all this story from this Jim Jannard's post:

http://www.cinematog...n...st&p=126897


Please, don't mix myself up with those people. Thank you.

Edited by Patrizio De Sica, 16 September 2006 - 02:40 PM.

  • 0


Willys Widgets

Opal

Tai Audio

Wooden Camera

Paralinx LLC

Ritter Battery

Aerial Filmworks

rebotnix Technologies

Broadcast Solutions Inc

FJS International, LLC

CineTape

Abel Cine

Technodolly

Visual Products

Glidecam

The Slider

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Rig Wheels Passport

Metropolis Post

CineLab

CineLab

Technodolly

Willys Widgets

Opal

Visual Products

FJS International, LLC

Metropolis Post

Paralinx LLC

Ritter Battery

rebotnix Technologies

Glidecam

Abel Cine

CineTape

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Aerial Filmworks

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

The Slider

Tai Audio

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Rig Wheels Passport

Wooden Camera