Jump to content


Photo

Why do people say wide shots "fall apart" in Mini-DV?


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Jim Feldspar

Jim Feldspar
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 288 posts
  • Student

Posted 03 January 2007 - 11:30 AM

Somebody wrote this about a week ago in another thread but I asked and haven't heard back about
why he wrote:

"and this thing (DVX-100) can handle itself against alot of the "big-boys". prob is, with most DV, wide
shots fall apart, paticularly day-exteriors, on the big screen they look awful, and i've had to shoot
some 16mm or s16 for those scenes (usually a stock with a 200asa or higher)"

I asked : Why don't the wide shots hold up? How about with the HVX-200, particularly shooting 720
24P HD, would you happen to know? Thanks.
  • 0

#2 Josh Bass

Josh Bass
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 552 posts
  • Other

Posted 03 January 2007 - 11:39 AM

It just means that you have 720x480 pixels trying to resolve a whole hell of a lot of detail, in a wide shot, and it just can't do it, once blown up large enough. With a closeup, you're seeing a lot "less" of whatever it is you're shooting (a face, an object). Wide shots tend to look kinda fuzzy on the big screen. A wide shot of a person walking along a street, for example----that person's going to look like a line or two of pixels, not a human, if the shot's wide enough. Make sense?

I saw both "Tadpole" and "28 Days Later" in the theater, and I can see what people mean.

No opinion on your HVX question, sorry.
  • 0

#3 Jim Feldspar

Jim Feldspar
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 288 posts
  • Student

Posted 03 January 2007 - 03:16 PM

It just means that you have 720x480 pixels trying to resolve a whole hell of a lot of detail, in a wide shot, and it just can't do it, once blown up large enough. With a closeup, you're seeing a lot "less" of whatever it is you're shooting (a face, an object). Wide shots tend to look kinda fuzzy on the big screen. A wide shot of a person walking along a street, for example----that person's going to look like a line or two of pixels, not a human, if the shot's wide enough. Make sense?

I saw both "Tadpole" and "28 Days Later" in the theater, and I can see what people mean.

No opinion on your HVX question, sorry.


Thanks. I saw those two movies on DVD. I'll have to find something showing in a theater
that was shot on Mini-DV and see.


"that person's going to look like a line or two of pixels, not a human, if the shot's wide enough."

Hmmm, more close-ups here we come!
  • 0

#4 Brian Wells

Brian Wells
  • Sustaining Members
  • 438 posts
  • Other

Posted 03 January 2007 - 06:32 PM

I think it is because of the 1/3" sensors... There are a lot of wide shots on DVD that look awesome because they were shot on larger formats (35mm, 2/3" HD, etc.) Wide shots just don't look that good on MINIDV.
  • 0


Abel Cine

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

FJS International, LLC

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Aerial Filmworks

Metropolis Post

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

CineLab

Ritter Battery

CineTape

rebotnix Technologies

Tai Audio

Glidecam

Opal

Technodolly

Rig Wheels Passport

Willys Widgets

Paralinx LLC

Visual Products

The Slider

Wooden Camera

Technodolly

CineTape

Metropolis Post

Wooden Camera

Willys Widgets

Opal

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Ritter Battery

Rig Wheels Passport

CineLab

The Slider

Abel Cine

Paralinx LLC

Visual Products

Tai Audio

FJS International, LLC

rebotnix Technologies

Glidecam

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Aerial Filmworks