Jump to content


Photo

E.X.P.E.X.R.


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 Amarjeet Singh Sadal

Amarjeet Singh Sadal
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 31 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 08 January 2007 - 05:36 PM

E.X.P.E.X.R. <<< stands for Experimental Exercise.
finished a few weeks back.
experimental filmmaking as i think it should be.

critical analysis and advice welcome.


  • 0

#2 Nicholas Jenkins

Nicholas Jenkins
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 148 posts
  • Student
  • Missoula, MT

Posted 08 January 2007 - 05:42 PM

Interesting stuff. I'm not a big fan of non-narrative film, but I think it was lit and shot well. Beyond that, I can't realy comment on it. It was weird, but at the same time the images all made sense to me on their own.
  • 0

#3 Jonathan Bowerbank

Jonathan Bowerbank
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2815 posts
  • 1st Assistant Camera
  • San Francisco, CA

Posted 08 January 2007 - 06:01 PM

I really liked the composition with the first shot of the leg & the tomato. It looked like the beginning to a very crisply shot sports commercial or something.

I think it could have benefitted from less lens flare, but not bad at all.
  • 0

#4 Amarjeet Singh Sadal

Amarjeet Singh Sadal
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 31 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 08 January 2007 - 06:05 PM

thanks guys. forgot to mention. its my first short.

we were planning to shoot in this old dilapidated building but the plans failed. therefor i ended up shooting on the uni studio. therefore i used lensflare to hide the studio walls. don know if what i did to acheive what i jus mentioned makes any sensible sense. but worked for me :)

Edited by Amarjeet Singh Sadal, 08 January 2007 - 06:08 PM.

  • 0

#5 Lee Maisel

Lee Maisel
  • Sustaining Members
  • 67 posts
  • Student

Posted 08 January 2007 - 09:29 PM

WOW! That was well done!
  • 0

#6 Amarjeet Singh Sadal

Amarjeet Singh Sadal
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 31 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 10 January 2007 - 02:52 PM

thanks lee.

i would appreciate some feedback and talk on this kind of film making.
some technical & fx criticism is also welcome.
  • 0

#7 Amarjeet Singh Sadal

Amarjeet Singh Sadal
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 31 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 06 February 2007 - 04:21 PM

BUMP
  • 0

#8 Martin Yernazian

Martin Yernazian
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 430 posts
  • Director
  • San Francisco/Los Angeles CA USA

Posted 09 February 2007 - 05:53 PM

Dr Mr Sadal

I found your project pretty interesting, I want to ask you , what did you shoot this with?

Please elaborate with camera, lens, film, etc.


Thanks
  • 0

#9 Amarjeet Singh Sadal

Amarjeet Singh Sadal
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 31 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 12 February 2007 - 12:04 PM

hi martin,
it was shot on university studio since we had no budget for anything.

we used arri srII filming on 100t 7212. lenses available to us were 9mm, 12mm, a zoom lens(don remember focal length, sorry)
lights used were 1000, 600 & dedo.

got back telecine footage on a minidv since our uni avid only has minidv decks.

post production color correction and visual effects were done on after effects and fusion.

regards,
amarjeet
  • 0


Aerial Filmworks

FJS International, LLC

Broadcast Solutions Inc

The Slider

Wooden Camera

Rig Wheels Passport

Technodolly

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Visual Products

Tai Audio

Glidecam

CineLab

CineTape

Ritter Battery

Abel Cine

Paralinx LLC

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Metropolis Post

Opal

Willys Widgets

rebotnix Technologies

CineLab

Ritter Battery

The Slider

rebotnix Technologies

Visual Products

CineTape

Aerial Filmworks

Willys Widgets

Tai Audio

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Metropolis Post

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Wooden Camera

Opal

Paralinx LLC

Glidecam

Technodolly

FJS International, LLC

Abel Cine

Rig Wheels Passport