Jump to content


Photo

Which format to practice with to be prepared


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Bhavin Amin

Bhavin Amin
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 17 posts
  • Student

Posted 17 January 2007 - 04:40 PM

I've been reading books for both, digital and regular cinematography but I'm not sure which format I should be practicing with. I want to invest in a camera for the upcoming summer, however, I'm on a tight budget.

Other than that - which medium do you think will pay off practicing with in order to become more familiar with cinematography? What do you think production companies and grad schools will look for - experience with 3CCD video/HD or 8mm/16mm films? Which provides the better payoffs?

Personally, I know working with video is cheaper - but also easier to work with and it seems alot of people can pick it up more easily than film cinematography. With the challenge and rewarding experience film cinematography gives you, it also costs more with processing and transfers. So which more cost efficient? What will the medium be for making movies in the next 3 or 4 years? What will grad schools or production companies look for, experience in film or video?

Keep in mind I am looking to enter the movie making industry - not TV broadcasting.

If the experts on these boards can offer advice and/or share how they became who they are - I'd appreciate it!
  • 0

#2 Kevin Masuda

Kevin Masuda
  • Sustaining Members
  • 209 posts
  • Director

Posted 17 January 2007 - 10:16 PM

Practice with both film and video. Maybe try some super 8, a lot cheaper than 16mm. As far as what camera to invest in, it all depends on how much you're willing to spend. What's your budget like for a camera? Two cameras out there that you might want to look at: DVX-100B or the new Sony HVR-V1U(which is an HDV 24p capable camera).


Kev
  • 0

#3 Bhavin Amin

Bhavin Amin
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 17 posts
  • Student

Posted 18 January 2007 - 01:01 AM

College student budget, the extreme is $1000. But I figure, if I get a decent 24p camera (3k, 4k range) I'd be spending the same amount of money buying a decent 16mm camera + film stock price + processing fee.

><

Sucks that we're in the transition phase from film to video. I don't even think there are that many places I can send Super 8 film to without covering a shipping fee too.
  • 0

#4 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 20068 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 18 January 2007 - 01:26 AM

I like Super-8 as a learning tool -- you don't necessarily have to transfer it to video; projecting the original (if reversal) can teach you a lot.

But if you're going to mainly work in 24P video, which is also a good way to learn, I'd at least take up 35mm still photography, and even more ideally, maybe shoot b&w so you can spend some time in a darkroom developing and making prints. You'll learn a lot about the basics of exposure, density, printing, etc.
  • 0

#5 Bhavin Amin

Bhavin Amin
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 17 posts
  • Student

Posted 18 January 2007 - 01:59 AM

Well, it's not like I'm completely new to the scene. I've developed 35mm still photographs since high school and shot a 20 min short using the DVX-100a just last year. I've recently worked with super8 and completed my first 16mm using a Bolex H16 Reflex camera.

Maybe it will clear up if I say what I want to use the camera for - eventually to make a reel to show grad schools. However, I'd like to test the effects gels, scrims, filters, etc have on the lit subject and try various lighting schemes.

Using the film medium seemed very costly, I spent at least 200+ dollars per film after buying stock, shipping, and processing. May not seem like much in the film world, but from the perspective of a student - it's a buttload.

Initially I felt going digital was the ideal and cost-effective way to test these schemes. I was just wondering if anyone had objections to this or had an opinion on which medium gives more useful experience in the long run.

As of now, I'm leaning towards getting a 24p camera - and the DVX100b sure seems friendly.
  • 0

#6 Patrick Cooper

Patrick Cooper
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 908 posts
  • Other

Posted 18 January 2007 - 02:05 AM

Sounds like you do have a fair amount of experiences in all these areas. Good luck with your 24p camera purchase!

Edited by Patrick Cooper, 18 January 2007 - 02:10 AM.

  • 0

#7 Jonathan Bowerbank

Jonathan Bowerbank
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2815 posts
  • 1st Assistant Camera
  • San Francisco, CA

Posted 18 January 2007 - 03:33 AM

Film...video...whichever. If you're able to make either look good than you're getting the practice you need.

Never hurts to work in both formats. You can shoot as much video as you want and practice lighting for the performance. Since you're on a very tight budget, you may also want to consider doing a lot of still photography to get your celluloid basics down.
  • 0


The Slider

Ritter Battery

FJS International, LLC

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

rebotnix Technologies

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Visual Products

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Tai Audio

Willys Widgets

Metropolis Post

Paralinx LLC

Rig Wheels Passport

Aerial Filmworks

CineLab

Abel Cine

Technodolly

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

CineTape

Glidecam

Wooden Camera

Paralinx LLC

Willys Widgets

Rig Wheels Passport

FJS International, LLC

Tai Audio

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

rebotnix Technologies

Ritter Battery

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Aerial Filmworks

Wooden Camera

Technodolly

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Metropolis Post

Abel Cine

The Slider

CineLab

Glidecam

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

CineTape

Visual Products