Which 35mm for commercials?
Posted 28 February 2007 - 02:54 PM
Posted 28 February 2007 - 04:01 PM
Also does the Arri 235 have a better look,feel and quality then the AatonIII? Thanks guys!
Edited by Mehran H, 28 February 2007 - 04:03 PM.
Posted 28 February 2007 - 04:12 PM
But here we go...
There is no visual difference between the cameras.
If you are using the same lens and filmstock, there is no difference in the final look, no matter which camera you use even an Arri IIc.
Edited by Alex Lindblom, 28 February 2007 - 04:13 PM.
Posted 28 February 2007 - 06:56 PM
If you want Panavision lenses, for instance, you are locked into Panavision cameras (or the Pan-435), so lenses will also determine your camera. The Moviecam SL and Arricam LT were specifically designed to be versatile across all usage, be it studio, handheld, or Steadicam. People wanting 35mm sync cameras who are on a budget may also use slightly-older but reliable models such as the Panaflex G2, Arriflex 535, or Moviecam Compact.
At the end of the day, though, it comes down to: what are you doing? and how much can you spend?