Jump to content


Photo

Anamorphic lenses on video


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Thomas Smith

Thomas Smith
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 35 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Paris

Posted 14 April 2007 - 10:19 PM

Have someone used anamorphic lenses on HD cameras?
  • 0

#2 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 20074 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 14 April 2007 - 10:42 PM

Have someone used anamorphic lenses on HD cameras?


I did a low-budget music video using JDC anamorphics (standard 2X cine anamorphics) on a Varicam, using a P&S Pro-35 adaptor. We left it sort of squeezed-looking.
  • 0

#3 Thomas Smith

Thomas Smith
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 35 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Paris

Posted 14 April 2007 - 10:57 PM

We are going to shoot a feature with a very low budget, and i´m going to use a HVX 200, with a Brevis adapter and Lomo anamorphic, but we don´t know what´s going to happen. Because the director wants the film 2.35.

Edited by Thomas Smith, 14 April 2007 - 10:59 PM.

  • 0

#4 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 20074 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 15 April 2007 - 12:16 AM

We are going to shoot a feature with a very low budget, and i´m going to use a HVX 200, with a Brevis adapter and Lomo anamorphic, but we don´t know what´s going to happen. Because the director wants the film 2.35.


There's no real point to using a normal cine anamorphic lens on an HD camera if you want a 2.35 image -- it has a 2X squeeze, which means on a 16x9 HD (1.78 : 1) camera, you get a 3.56 : 1 image when unsqueezed. You'd basically be cropping the 16x9 width down to less than 4x3 if you had a 2X optical squeeze to the image.

What you would need is an anamorphic lens with a 1.33X squeeze, which doesn't really exist yet.

You're better off just framing for cropping to 2.35, that way you also have a separate 16x9 full-frame HD master for TV deliverables where they don't want any letterboxing.
  • 0

#5 Thomas Smith

Thomas Smith
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 35 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Paris

Posted 15 April 2007 - 10:46 AM

You're better off just framing for cropping to 2.35, that way you also have a separate 16x9 full-frame HD master for TV deliverables where they don't want any letterboxing.


Thanx David i think that´s the solution.
  • 0


rebotnix Technologies

The Slider

Abel Cine

Glidecam

CineLab

Metropolis Post

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Willys Widgets

Rig Wheels Passport

CineTape

Visual Products

FJS International, LLC

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Tai Audio

Technodolly

Ritter Battery

Paralinx LLC

Wooden Camera

Aerial Filmworks

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Visual Products

Rig Wheels Passport

Ritter Battery

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Metropolis Post

Willys Widgets

Tai Audio

The Slider

CineLab

rebotnix Technologies

Glidecam

Wooden Camera

Abel Cine

Broadcast Solutions Inc

CineTape

FJS International, LLC

Technodolly

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Paralinx LLC

Aerial Filmworks

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment