Jump to content


Photo

Registration test in reverse


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 Kar Wai Ng

Kar Wai Ng
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 127 posts
  • 1st Assistant Camera
  • Toronto, Canada

Posted 28 April 2007 - 12:13 AM

Is it okay to run the second pass of a reg test in reverse (on cameras that run reverse), or should you always rewind on a bench and run it forwards only on the camera? Is it possible for registration error to show up when running reverse but not forwards (or vice versa)? I figure that the movement isn't really doing anything different, just doing everything in the reverse order, but I wasn't sure about whether registration would be affected by the film direction...
  • 0

#2 Bernie O'Doherty

Bernie O'Doherty
  • Sustaining Members
  • 232 posts
  • Other
  • Newark Valley, NY

Posted 28 April 2007 - 04:40 AM

Theoretically there should be no difference. In practice, however, there are things like claw and registration shape differences. Mag feed and take-up tensions working in reverse etc.
All that being said, I'd love to hear the result !
  • 0

#3 Stephen Williams

Stephen Williams
  • Sustaining Members
  • 4708 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Europe

Posted 28 April 2007 - 04:59 AM

Is it okay to run the second pass of a reg test in reverse (on cameras that run reverse), or should you always rewind on a bench and run it forwards only on the camera? Is it possible for registration error to show up when running reverse but not forwards (or vice versa)? I figure that the movement isn't really doing anything different, just doing everything in the reverse order, but I wasn't sure about whether registration would be affected by the film direction...


Hi,

With a camera such as a Mitchell with 2 register pins it makes no difference whatsoever, however unless you are shooting some passes forward & some passes backwards (which is comen with motion control), its not a useful test! Should the results not be steady, it does not help in establishing if the camera in question is steady when shooting forwards.

Stephen
  • 0

#4 Bernie O'Doherty

Bernie O'Doherty
  • Sustaining Members
  • 232 posts
  • Other
  • Newark Valley, NY

Posted 28 April 2007 - 08:00 AM

Good point Stephen. Perhaps it would mean doing double image exposures forward as one test of forward stability. Then doing double image exposure tests separetely (different 100 ft roll) running in reverse.
At least one could test forward stability versus reverse stability.
  • 0

#5 Chris Keth

Chris Keth
  • Sustaining Members
  • 4427 posts
  • 1st Assistant Camera
  • Los Angeles

Posted 28 April 2007 - 09:44 AM

It won't help you as a test very often but it saves you time if you run in reverse with a lenscap on then do the second run of your test.
  • 0

#6 Kar Wai Ng

Kar Wai Ng
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 127 posts
  • 1st Assistant Camera
  • Toronto, Canada

Posted 28 April 2007 - 11:45 AM

It won't help you as a test very often but it saves you time if you run in reverse with a lenscap on then do the second run of your test.



I've been very tempted to do that; basically using the reverse mode as a 'rewind' only thing. But then I've been told I shouldn't do that because it puts extra stress on the perfs and when you do your second forward pass, the film's already been through two passes which might affect the perf shape and hence stability on the second pass. Is there any truth to that?
  • 0

#7 Stephen Williams

Stephen Williams
  • Sustaining Members
  • 4708 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Europe

Posted 28 April 2007 - 12:00 PM

I've been very tempted to do that; basically using the reverse mode as a 'rewind' only thing. But then I've been told I shouldn't do that because it puts extra stress on the perfs and when you do your second forward pass, the film's already been through two passes which might affect the perf shape and hence stability on the second pass. Is there any truth to that?


Hi,

In the past I have exposed film with 100+ passes using Oxberry & Mitchell cameras, 16 + 35mm without problem. If the camera is 'picking' the perfs it's not a good sign, looking at the perfs with a magnifying glass will reveal any problems.

Stephen
  • 0

#8 Kar Wai Ng

Kar Wai Ng
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 127 posts
  • 1st Assistant Camera
  • Toronto, Canada

Posted 28 April 2007 - 08:03 PM

Sounds reassuring. I guess it's not something I should really worry about.

Thanks everyone for your input.
  • 0

#9 Chris Keth

Chris Keth
  • Sustaining Members
  • 4427 posts
  • 1st Assistant Camera
  • Los Angeles

Posted 28 April 2007 - 08:07 PM

Sounds reassuring. I guess it's not something I should really worry about.

Thanks everyone for your input.


I wouldn't worry about it. Film is tough stuff. Think of how many times a release pring goes through the projector movement. Even by the end of its working life it's still steady. One more run through a camera won't hurt it.

The only thing I would avoid, if you're doing high-speed registration tests, is also running the film in reverse to rewind it at a high speed.

Edited by Chris Keth, 28 April 2007 - 08:08 PM.

  • 0

#10 Jon Kukla

Jon Kukla
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 399 posts
  • Other

Posted 30 April 2007 - 02:32 AM

I wouldn't worry about it. Film is tough stuff. Think of how many times a release pring goes through the projector movement. Even by the end of its working life it's still steady. One more run through a camera won't hurt it.


That's not quite a fair comparison - film neg is BH perfs on acetate stock, while prints are KS perfs (bigger) on estar (stronger).
  • 0


rebotnix Technologies

Tai Audio

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Opal

Ritter Battery

Metropolis Post

Visual Products

The Slider

CineLab

FJS International, LLC

Glidecam

CineTape

Technodolly

Paralinx LLC

Willys Widgets

Aerial Filmworks

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Abel Cine

Rig Wheels Passport

Wooden Camera

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

FJS International, LLC

Technodolly

Tai Audio

Opal

Aerial Filmworks

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Wooden Camera

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Glidecam

Paralinx LLC

CineLab

Rig Wheels Passport

Visual Products

rebotnix Technologies

Willys Widgets

Abel Cine

The Slider

CineTape

Ritter Battery

Metropolis Post

Gamma Ray Digital Inc