Jump to content


Photo

Zodiac Shot


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Mary Crowley

Mary Crowley

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts
  • Camera Operator
  • Cork,Ireland

Posted 04 June 2007 - 11:21 AM

Hi,
I don't know if this question hs already been asked, but here goes anyway. I just saw Zodiac and loved the shot where the camera tilts up from the bottom of a building that being built, and as it does, all the scaffolding etc moves. It looks like a simple time lapse shot, but surely they didn't leave a camera there long enough to catch it. Any ideas?
Mary.
  • 0

#2 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 19769 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 04 June 2007 - 11:30 AM

It's not historical time-lapse footage of the Transamerica building being constructed -- it was CGI (computer animation basically with a fake time-lapse effect.)

But yes, normally you'd have to leave the camera out there for the duration in order for the framing to stay constant (and a tilt-up or down, or a pan, would require a complex motion control rig, or simply careful camera movements if it didn't have to be smooth. It's a little like stop-motion photography.)

Nowadays, though, someone probably would use a digital still camera with a high resolution, and if the camera was brought out there once a day, a picture taken, and removed again, so the framing wasn't precise, it probably could be realigned in post by zooming into the photo a little.
  • 0

#3 sergio cassini

sergio cassini
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 16 posts
  • Camera Operator
  • Switzerland

Posted 04 June 2007 - 11:45 AM

check out the video slideshow on this site studiodaily,explains it all.

Edited by sergio cassini, 04 June 2007 - 11:46 AM.

  • 0

#4 Mary Crowley

Mary Crowley

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts
  • Camera Operator
  • Cork,Ireland

Posted 04 June 2007 - 01:37 PM

Thanks for that. Its a fantastic website.
  • 0

#5 Satsuki Murashige

Satsuki Murashige
  • Sustaining Members
  • 3510 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • San Francisco, CA

Posted 04 June 2007 - 04:19 PM

The April 2007 issue of Cinefex has an article about that shot and the other effects shots in "Zodiac," quite informative. You can order back issues here: http://www.cinefex.c...backissues.html

It's a pricy publication though, like $13 or so at newstand.
  • 0

#6 Tom Lowe

Tom Lowe
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1211 posts
  • Director
  • somewhere worshipping Terrence Malick

Posted 12 July 2007 - 01:34 AM

The photography really looked superb on this movie. There were very few shots at all that gave away its digital origins in a bad way, and a few night and evening shots that just looked great (like Collateral and Miami Vice).

Edited by Tom Lowe, 12 July 2007 - 01:39 AM.

  • 0

#7 Robert Glenn

Robert Glenn
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 247 posts
  • Other

Posted 13 July 2007 - 01:01 AM

The opening scene with the couple was a bit surreal to me. The composition gave the characters a very strange rendition as if it were live television but on film
  • 0


CineLab

Willys Widgets

Glidecam

Abel Cine

Visual Products

The Slider

Tai Audio

Metropolis Post

CineTape

Aerial Filmworks

Opal

Rig Wheels Passport

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Technodolly

Wooden Camera

rebotnix Technologies

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

FJS International, LLC

Ritter Battery

Paralinx LLC

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

CineLab

Aerial Filmworks

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Tai Audio

CineTape

Metropolis Post

Opal

Glidecam

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Paralinx LLC

FJS International, LLC

Technodolly

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

The Slider

Rig Wheels Passport

Visual Products

Willys Widgets

Ritter Battery

Wooden Camera

Abel Cine

rebotnix Technologies