Jump to content


Photo

The mathematics of slow mo


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Ewan Macleod

Ewan Macleod

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
  • Director

Posted 06 June 2007 - 10:44 PM

Hi all, glad to join the site.

I'm working with a cinematographer on a music video in the next few days. we are shooting in super 16mm in a studio with a steadycam and it is a one shot clip.

We are intending to shoot the whole thing at a frame rate of 33.3fps to acheive a little bit of a surreal slowness to movement.

To get the band to perform in sync im wondering what percentage should they speed the song up and put it onto DAT tape??

cheers, ewan.

Edited by Ewan Macleod, 06 June 2007 - 10:44 PM.

  • 0

#2 Nick Mulder

Nick Mulder
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1023 posts
  • Other
  • Auckland, New Zealand

Posted 06 June 2007 - 11:22 PM

sheesh !

33.3 / your output fps = answer

eg. for 24fps

33.3/24 = 1.3875
  • 0

#3 Ewan Macleod

Ewan Macleod

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
  • Director

Posted 07 June 2007 - 12:19 AM

sheesh !

33.3 / your output fps = answer

eg. for 24fps

33.3/24 = 1.3875



cool. thanks, yeah i thought it was that.

our output is 25fps so 33.3 / 25 = 1.332 so

the song which is 4mins 12 seconds is compressed by 133.2% yeah ?

Edited by Ewan Macleod, 07 June 2007 - 12:20 AM.

  • 0

#4 Nick Mulder

Nick Mulder
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1023 posts
  • Other
  • Auckland, New Zealand

Posted 07 June 2007 - 02:02 AM

cool. thanks, yeah i thought it was that.

our output is 25fps so 33.3 / 25 = 1.332 so

the song which is 4mins 12 seconds is compressed by 133.2% yeah ?

not sure of the terminology of whatever software you are using there, but I'm sure with a bit of plodding this way and that you'll sort it out...

252 / new time = 1.332

>> new time = 189 sec (3 min 9 sec)

make it so scotty !
  • 0

#5 Ewan Macleod

Ewan Macleod

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
  • Director

Posted 07 June 2007 - 08:46 AM

not sure of the terminology of whatever software you are using there, but I'm sure with a bit of plodding this way and that you'll sort it out...

252 / new time = 1.332

>> new time = 189 sec (3 min 9 sec)

make it so scotty !

Thanks Nick. I dp need to check this out further as we dont really have stock to experiment with.

Cheers for the help.

It sounds right!!! But any mathematicians on the site?
  • 0

#6 Nick Mulder

Nick Mulder
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1023 posts
  • Other
  • Auckland, New Zealand

Posted 11 June 2007 - 03:06 AM

Thanks Nick. I dp need to check this out further as we dont really have stock to experiment with.

Cheers for the help.

It sounds right!!! But any mathematicians on the site?

I've done a few years at uni - engineering drop-out to be exact ...
  • 0

#7 Ewan Macleod

Ewan Macleod

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
  • Director

Posted 11 June 2007 - 11:26 AM

I've done a few years at uni - engineering drop-out to be exact ...


nice one. Im a digital film making graduate but still owe the college 1k for late assignment submissions.

we ending up shooting at 37.5fps - 150% speed up when coming from and going back to 25fps..

also one at 50fps - 200%
  • 0


FJS International, LLC

Technodolly

Willys Widgets

Rig Wheels Passport

Tai Audio

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Glidecam

The Slider

Paralinx LLC

Abel Cine

Ritter Battery

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Wooden Camera

rebotnix Technologies

Metropolis Post

CineLab

Visual Products

Aerial Filmworks

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

CineTape

Broadcast Solutions Inc

CineLab

Aerial Filmworks

Tai Audio

CineTape

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Willys Widgets

FJS International, LLC

Visual Products

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Ritter Battery

Technodolly

Glidecam

Paralinx LLC

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Abel Cine

The Slider

Wooden Camera

Rig Wheels Passport

Metropolis Post

rebotnix Technologies

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS