Jump to content


reversal or negative?


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 Ole Dost

Ole Dost
  • Guests

Posted 30 June 2007 - 02:31 AM

I want to a documentary feature in autumn. Still I have silly question. The film is supposed to be telecined and it is the video-file derived from it, that will be used for cutting and postproduction. What is better in this special situation: negative film? Probably there is no need for copiing the film. Or better use reversal film with better contrast? The fact that brings me to this question is the following: in the times, when 16mm was in use for TV, almost entirely reversal stock had been used.
What do you recommend?
  • 0

#2 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 20069 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 30 June 2007 - 02:55 AM

Negative is better-suited for video transfer than reversal, due to its lower contrast.
  • 0

#3 Ole Dost

Ole Dost
  • Guests

Posted 30 June 2007 - 07:58 AM

Thank you David, for the quick reply and the good advice.
All the best,
Ole
  • 0


Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Wooden Camera

rebotnix Technologies

Paralinx LLC

Metropolis Post

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

FJS International, LLC

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Ritter Battery

Tai Audio

Visual Products

Glidecam

Technodolly

Broadcast Solutions Inc

CineTape

Willys Widgets

Abel Cine

The Slider

Aerial Filmworks

CineLab

Rig Wheels Passport

CineLab

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Willys Widgets

rebotnix Technologies

Wooden Camera

Visual Products

Ritter Battery

Abel Cine

Paralinx LLC

FJS International, LLC

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

The Slider

Glidecam

Tai Audio

Technodolly

Aerial Filmworks

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

CineTape

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Rig Wheels Passport

Metropolis Post