Jump to content


Photo

Informal Poll


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Rebecca Pryce

Rebecca Pryce

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
  • Other
  • Charleston, SC

Posted 31 August 2007 - 05:32 PM

I was trained under a - let's say "elderly" gentleman - who would refer to footcandles as he lit a set. My colleague always uses f-stops.

Which do you prefer and why?

Thanks in advance.
  • 0

#2 Jonathan Bowerbank

Jonathan Bowerbank
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2815 posts
  • 1st Assistant Camera
  • San Francisco, CA

Posted 31 August 2007 - 05:59 PM

F-stop, it's just easier for me because I know what at key, 1 stop under, 2 stops under, etc. look like.

I check the footcandles quite often though, just out of curiosity and as a way of learning by myself the correlation between fc's and f-stops for different ASA's. It's just always good to understand as many aspects of light as possible.

Edited by Jonathan Bowerbank, 31 August 2007 - 06:00 PM.

  • 0

#3 e gustavo petersen

e gustavo petersen
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 128 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • LA | CA | USA

Posted 31 August 2007 - 06:33 PM

I think it depends on who you're talking to. I often might speak to my gaffer (especially if he's older) in terms of foot-candles and my camera assist in ?- or T-stops. The gaffer might not know (or care to know) what filters, shutter, etc. I might be using, so this makes our common language easy.

It's a useful bit of knowledge and communication tool as more people judge exposure on a monitor instead of in their head.
  • 0

#4 Rebecca Pryce

Rebecca Pryce

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
  • Other
  • Charleston, SC

Posted 31 August 2007 - 06:33 PM

"I check the footcandles quite often though, just out of curiosity..."

A colleague cracked a joke that "if anyone mentions a footcandle on a set, stop and take a picture of it. It'd be like capturing the sasquatch."

I think he's wrong. But if you only check footcandles out of curiousity...anyway. Thanks for posting.

Edited by Rebecca Pryce, 31 August 2007 - 06:34 PM.

  • 0

#5 Rebecca Pryce

Rebecca Pryce

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
  • Other
  • Charleston, SC

Posted 31 August 2007 - 06:36 PM

I think it depends on who you're talking to. I often might speak to my gaffer (especially if he's older) in terms of foot-candles and my camera assist in ?- or T-stops. The gaffer might not know (or care to know) what filters, shutter, etc. I might be using, so this makes our common language easy.

It's a useful bit of knowledge and communication tool as more people judge exposure on a monitor instead of in their head.



And that's precisely the logic of the "old school," the way I was taught. Thanks for your input!
  • 0


Opal

Ritter Battery

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Metropolis Post

Abel Cine

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Technodolly

Tai Audio

Wooden Camera

CineTape

FJS International, LLC

Glidecam

The Slider

rebotnix Technologies

CineLab

Rig Wheels Passport

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Visual Products

Paralinx LLC

Willys Widgets

Aerial Filmworks

rebotnix Technologies

Metropolis Post

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Abel Cine

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Rig Wheels Passport

FJS International, LLC

Wooden Camera

Aerial Filmworks

Technodolly

Visual Products

Tai Audio

Willys Widgets

Glidecam

Ritter Battery

Opal

The Slider

CineTape

CineLab

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Paralinx LLC