Jump to content


Photo

Phantom HD or HD (2K) & 65 (4K)?


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Lance Flores

Lance Flores
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 124 posts
  • Producer
  • San Antonio/Dallas/Detroit

Posted 19 October 2007 - 01:40 PM

Are your setting this up for discussion on both the Phantoms; HD and Phantom 65 which is their 4K 65mm?
  • 0

#2 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 19759 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 19 October 2007 - 02:55 PM

Are your setting this up for discussion on both the Phantoms; HD and Phantom 65 which is their 4K 65mm?


I doubt there would be enough traffic to justify separate forums for each camera...
  • 0

#3 Mitch Gross

Mitch Gross
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2873 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 19 October 2007 - 03:23 PM

There are other models in the Phantom line, older models such as the V10 and the V7.3. These are still current models and therefore deserve discussion as well, but it probably makes sense to keep it all to one forum, at least for now. The V7.3 is "only" 800x600, but it can shoot 6600fps and if you drop the resolution to 320x240 it can shoot 32,000fps! There is also the little Miro line of cameras, which are as small as your averago point & shoot digital still cameras, but take c-mount glass as can shoot high speed. It's a lot of product but at least for our industry I think one forum can handle it all for now.
  • 0

#4 Lance Flores

Lance Flores
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 124 posts
  • Producer
  • San Antonio/Dallas/Detroit

Posted 19 October 2007 - 04:07 PM

I doubt there would be enough traffic to justify separate forums for each camera...


Dave, Mitch, hey I agree. Just wondered why it was being limited to the Phantom HD model.
  • 0

#5 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 19759 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 19 October 2007 - 04:15 PM

Dave, Mitch, hey I agree. Just wondered why it was being limited to the Phantom HD model.


Maybe Tim should just relabel it "Phantom" but I don't see a problem posting here on different Phantom cameras.
  • 0

#6 Mitch Gross

Mitch Gross
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2873 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 19 October 2007 - 10:21 PM

I actually think "Phantom HD" is the best name as that is what has received the most attention and will likely be the most useful way for people to find information. If we really wanted to be accurate we would call it the "Vision Research" forum since that is the manufacturer, or perhaps we should ask Tim to change "Dalsa" to "Origin and Evolution" and "RED" to "One." Go by what people are used to calling it.

"Scuse me while I put a Band-Aide on my Xerox. ;-)
  • 0


Abel Cine

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Ritter Battery

FJS International, LLC

Tai Audio

rebotnix Technologies

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

The Slider

Aerial Filmworks

Opal

CineTape

Technodolly

Wooden Camera

CineLab

Paralinx LLC

Willys Widgets

Glidecam

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Rig Wheels Passport

Visual Products

Metropolis Post

Aerial Filmworks

Tai Audio

Wooden Camera

Broadcast Solutions Inc

FJS International, LLC

Metropolis Post

CineTape

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Opal

The Slider

Technodolly

Visual Products

Willys Widgets

Abel Cine

Glidecam

Rig Wheels Passport

rebotnix Technologies

Ritter Battery

Paralinx LLC

CineLab

Gamma Ray Digital Inc