Jump to content


Photo

Smoque Filters


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Frank DiBugnara

Frank DiBugnara
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 168 posts

Posted 23 October 2007 - 01:51 AM

A few days before my last shoot, I found out I was not able to smoke a few locations. So I decided to bring in a set of Smoque filters. There has been some talk of these lately so I thought I'd post some side by side comparisons from my shoot. I always shot one take without the filter. Stock was 5205 and stop was about a 4.

I had no ability to test ahead of time, so I played it safe. I had intensities 1 though 4. Even on a wide lens, a #1 (lightest) looked pretty significant in the viewfinder--much more significant than on film. I shot this scene at two focal lengths:

Wide Shot was UltraPrime 24mm. I used a #2 on this shot:

Posted Image

24mm Prime with Smoque #2 Quicktime

For comparison, here's another take clean with no filter:

Posted Image

24mm Prime No Filter Quicktime

For the close up I switched to the the Optimo 29-250 at about 110mm. I assumed that the Smoque filters would behave more like the ProMists in that the effect would be much more pronounced at longer focal lengths. Because of this, I shot the CU with a #1. The effect was pretty subtle:

Posted Image

CU with Smoque #1 Quicktime

Posted Image

CU with no Filter Quicktime
  • 0

#2 Jonathan Bowerbank

Jonathan Bowerbank
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2815 posts
  • 1st Assistant Camera
  • San Francisco, CA

Posted 23 October 2007 - 02:34 AM

Where I'm seeing the effects of the filter the most is in the elderly gentleman's wrinkles. His face appears quite smoother in the filtered take, and of course contrast is just a smidge lower.

The difference is small, but some light diffusion on the lens in this case seems quite nice.
  • 0

#3 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 20069 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 23 October 2007 - 11:08 AM

The tricky thing with Smoque filters is that the effect depends on the brightness of the light source in the frame. In these examples, there is not a window much brighter than the room itself for the filter to really catch and create a halo, so the effect is subtle. So you have to watch out shot-by-shot for anything that might overreact to the filter.
  • 0

#4 Jonathan Bowerbank

Jonathan Bowerbank
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2815 posts
  • 1st Assistant Camera
  • San Francisco, CA

Posted 23 October 2007 - 11:59 AM

The tricky thing with Smoque filters is that the effect depends on the brightness of the light source in the frame.


And with that actor crossing in front of the scene and blocking the light source, that would effectively ruin the effect of creating the appearance of actual smoke.
  • 0


Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Wooden Camera

Aerial Filmworks

CineLab

Tai Audio

Visual Products

Willys Widgets

Glidecam

Paralinx LLC

The Slider

Ritter Battery

Technodolly

Broadcast Solutions Inc

FJS International, LLC

Abel Cine

Metropolis Post

Rig Wheels Passport

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

CineTape

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

rebotnix Technologies

Ritter Battery

FJS International, LLC

The Slider

Tai Audio

Wooden Camera

CineTape

Paralinx LLC

Willys Widgets

Glidecam

Visual Products

Technodolly

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Aerial Filmworks

CineLab

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

rebotnix Technologies

Rig Wheels Passport

Abel Cine

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Metropolis Post