Posted 08 November 2007 - 11:54 PM
Even in the old days of hard lighting, it was not unheard of to use softened light for fill. In fact, you can see what looks like a 2K or 4K Soft Light reflected in Harrison Ford's glasses in "Raiders":
I did a short film a long time ago in the style of a 3-strip Technicolor movie and I made the decision to use hard lights for everything except the fill, which can from soft lights (Zips, etc.) -- but flagged to keep it directed somewhat.
Lighting with hard light is a great exercise because of how you learn to use flags, nets, and other grip items to sculpt it. And it really makes a difference in terms of how it is aimed, how high or low the key light is, etc. Plus learning to light backgrounds separately from faces sometimes.
Posted 09 November 2007 - 10:58 AM
The hard lighting in particular works well for all of that wooden furniture.
The movie itself looks intriguing...
Posted 09 November 2007 - 11:17 AM
For .. we saw some tests shot with the same camera and net prior to start shooting. The final effect, at DVD resolution, isn't as fuzzy and washed out. It will look more or less like a #1 filter, not as diffused as you see in these stills.
Posted 09 November 2007 - 11:29 AM
Was just watching "Four Feathers" on DVD again, shot by Robert Richardson in anamorphic using nets, which was lovely, similar to the diffused look he did for "Snow Falling on Cedars".
One interesting thing is that I noticed he set the net pattern so that it created a "+" rather than the more common "x" around points of light. Don't know why other than it made some of the flares from candles look more like the anamorphic horizontal flare.
Posted 14 November 2007 - 03:41 PM
Posted 14 November 2007 - 05:43 PM
Whenever I shoot with the DVX100 which does not allow you to change lenses I am forced to apply the net on the front (again with an elastic band). Downside is that when you are not in focus you can often see the net in all of it's chain link fence glory (even at the long end because it's video), and also you can't go wider than somewhere between 15-10mm, which is rather restricting when shooting on the usual cramped interior locations you get with no/low budget shoots.
Sounds like you should try a thinner net, like black tulle. There is only so much you can expect from front-mounting on a 1/3" chip camera, though.
Posted 14 November 2007 - 08:31 PM
Using them with 1/3" chip cameras does seem risky, though. On a recent HDV shoot I did, we were outdoors in the nature constantly, so we ended up with dust on the lens fairly often. Watching dailies later, there were a few instances where we missed a dirt speck and you could see it nearly in focus on the front element of the lens, very frustrating. But it seems like Tim and Ignacio are pretty aware of the potential problems, hopefully none popped up in the footage.
Posted 24 April 2008 - 08:20 AM
Posted 24 April 2008 - 04:33 PM
1. I see the difference, but am having trouble articulating the look, could anyone articulate the visual difference in using black netting behind the lens (vs. no netting)?
2. What is the difference in using different colored netting (i.e. white, tan... ect..)?
Thanks, and really interesting and beautiful look.
Edited by Jason Outenreath, 24 April 2008 - 04:35 PM.
Posted 26 April 2008 - 02:14 PM
The black net adds a diffusion that creates that halation, makes the lights and highlights glow and softens the image (great for concealing skin blemishes and wrinkles on talent). Behind the lens means we minimise the chances of seeing it (the physical net pattern) unintentionally in focus, plus the effect is much more subtle than in front of the lens (although it invites a load of back focus issues on video)!
The difference in using coloured netting is down to the effect you are after- I prefer black nets because they keep the contrast in, which is something you don't get with white or tan (both of which by comparison lower the contrast as they are lighter colours, though tan is nice for a slight sepia effect). Thanks for your kind comments btw.
Rupe- all the images load OK for me.
Interesting forum. I'm a newborn with more work on-camera, and
seeking to enter film school and/or gain intern, PA, experiences?
THANKS FOR DOING WHAT YOU DO BEST. Good luck, cheers, y
a uds se mando abrazos,