Jump to content


Photo

Private Ryan -a filter effect?


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Adam Thompson

Adam Thompson
  • Sustaining Members
  • 161 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 13 November 2007 - 02:27 PM

When the sissy soldier character "Opum" (spelling?) finally gets the balls to shoot the Nazi they earlier spared, near the end, the highlights smear upward on his shot. I was wondering if anyone knows if this was a filter or was it a post effect. I've seen a plug-in for FCP that will do it but is it mimicing a real filter?
  • 0

#2 Kevin Zanit

Kevin Zanit
  • Sustaining Members
  • 1223 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • LA

Posted 13 November 2007 - 03:03 PM

Do a search, been discussed a ton before (as have many of the other techniques used in SPR). It is from throwing the camera's movement out of phase with the shutter so that the camera is pulling down a new frame while the shutter is still partially open. The camera pulls the film down vertically, and thus the streaks are vertical as well.
  • 0

#3 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 20074 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 13 November 2007 - 03:03 PM

It's due to a deliberately mistimed shutter in the camera. Normally, the shutter is supposed to close over the gate before the movement advances the film to the next frame, to then be exposed when the shutter moves again to uncover the gate. But if the shutter is mistimed, the movement starts to advance to the next frame while the shutter is still moving to cover the gate, so the last percentage of the exposure on the frame is streaked. Since only the brightest objects in the frame have time to register in this brief moment, what you see are bright highlights streaking upwards vertically.

There are supposedly some post filters that simulate this effect.
  • 0

#4 Jamey Johnson

Jamey Johnson
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 31 posts
  • Student

Posted 13 November 2007 - 04:52 PM

The new Magic Bullet Looks has a "shutter streak" preset that is pretty close to the effect.
  • 0

#5 Brad Grimmett

Brad Grimmett
  • Sustaining Members
  • 2660 posts
  • Steadicam Operator
  • Los Angeles

Posted 13 November 2007 - 06:03 PM

Anyone know if Kaminski compensated for the slight exposure difference when shooting the mistimed shutter stuff? Is there even enough difference to bother compensating, or does it depend on just how far out of sync the shutter is?
  • 0

#6 Matt Kelly

Matt Kelly
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 85 posts
  • 1st Assistant Camera
  • Pasadena, CA

Posted 15 December 2007 - 02:15 AM

oh yeah I bet someone has done that math.. always worth testing yourself tho. You can take the shutter completely out of a Mitchell.... kind of extreme, but nifty.
  • 0


Willys Widgets

CineLab

rebotnix Technologies

Tai Audio

FJS International, LLC

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Abel Cine

Ritter Battery

Metropolis Post

CineTape

Aerial Filmworks

Rig Wheels Passport

Glidecam

Technodolly

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Visual Products

Wooden Camera

Paralinx LLC

The Slider

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Paralinx LLC

Abel Cine

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Glidecam

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Tai Audio

Ritter Battery

Rig Wheels Passport

CineTape

Aerial Filmworks

FJS International, LLC

Metropolis Post

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

rebotnix Technologies

The Slider

Willys Widgets

CineLab

Visual Products

Wooden Camera

Technodolly