Jump to content


Photo

For animation Arri or Bolex?


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Antonio

Antonio
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 18 posts
  • Other

Posted 23 January 2008 - 09:24 AM

Hi!

I have made some experimental films and animation with my Scoopic M. Now I have project, where I might need different lenses and perhaps 400 ft mag. I have considered two options, Arri 16S, arri 16M or Bolex EL. The question is: Is it easy to get time lapse/animation motors for arri cameras?I assume that Bolex EL has single frame function. Is there any other options wich I should take under consideration?

With Thanks
Antonio
  • 0

#2 Sam Wells

Sam Wells
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1751 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 23 January 2008 - 12:45 PM

Hi Antonio, I'd love to sell you my Arri S but really, I'd go with a Bolex:

Focal plane shutter, single frame capability built in. (The Arri's mirror shutter only design is fine for continuous action, but has the potential for adjacent frame fogging issues in single frame --- plus single rotation of the motor shaft does not give an even # of frames -----)

Don't know about aftermarket motors for the EL so I don't know if any issues with these:

http://www.norrisfil...olex/index.html

http://www.tobincine...com/page13.html

Does the EL NOT have a single frame shaft ??? (I can't remember)

Actually a Rex 5 with one of the above motors should work well for you. Or Rex 4 (do you really need the 400' mag ?)

-Sam (now shooting single frame etc with Nikon digital)
  • 0

#3 John Sprung

John Sprung
  • Sustaining Members
  • 4635 posts
  • Other

Posted 23 January 2008 - 01:05 PM

Definitely the Bolex. They were designed to do both continuous motion and single frame. The heavy mirror shutter of the Arri acts as a flywheel, which is a good thing for continuous motion, but a disadvantage for single frame start-stop.



-- J.S.
  • 0

#4 Edgar Dubrovskiy

Edgar Dubrovskiy
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 348 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • London

Posted 23 January 2008 - 01:13 PM

I would say Bolex.
  • 0

#5 John Stanhope

John Stanhope

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Salem,Mass

Posted 23 January 2008 - 01:32 PM

I would say using a Bolex H16 with a Tobin TTL motor and Some Kodak 7248 stock (100T) nice slow film, for animation.
  • 0

#6 Tim Carroll

Tim Carroll
  • Sustaining Members
  • 2168 posts
  • Other
  • Chicago, Illinois

Posted 23 January 2008 - 07:24 PM

Antonio,

I'm a huge Arriflex 16S and 16M fan, but I must agree with the above. For stop motion and animation, the Bolex is the camera I would choose over the Arriflex.

-Tim
  • 0

#7 Antonio

Antonio
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 18 posts
  • Other

Posted 24 January 2008 - 03:19 AM

Hi,

Thank you everyone for your answers! I have been thinking that the Bolex would suit for my projects better, so now I am starting to look one.
Thank you once again!

Antonio
  • 0


Broadcast Solutions Inc

Ritter Battery

Metropolis Post

Willys Widgets

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

CineTape

rebotnix Technologies

Abel Cine

Technodolly

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

The Slider

CineLab

FJS International, LLC

Visual Products

Tai Audio

Rig Wheels Passport

Aerial Filmworks

Paralinx LLC

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Wooden Camera

Glidecam

Glidecam

The Slider

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Metropolis Post

rebotnix Technologies

Technodolly

Abel Cine

Broadcast Solutions Inc

FJS International, LLC

Paralinx LLC

Aerial Filmworks

Tai Audio

Ritter Battery

CineLab

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Willys Widgets

Visual Products

Rig Wheels Passport

Wooden Camera

CineTape