Jump to content


Photo

Dumb question: Aesthetic difference between 16mm Reversal/negative...


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 Nick Castronuova

Nick Castronuova
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 40 posts
  • Student

Posted 16 February 2008 - 04:34 AM

Would anyone be able to tell me the aesthetic differences between color 16mm film and color reversal film? What are advantages/disadvantages, etc. Thanks!

Nick
  • 0

#2 Jim Carlile

Jim Carlile
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 464 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 26 February 2008 - 02:09 AM

It's not a dumb question at all. Most stocks-- meaning just about all- are negative, because they can be controlled better during printing and are actually cheaper and easier to use in post. Reversal films tend to be contrastier, more old-fashioned looking, more saturated, but many variables can enter into the printing process.

Lots of people rave about Fuji's Velvia 50. Very saturated and intense.

Sadly, it's difficult these days to get prints from reversals. They are one-off films, basically. I think both Kodak and Fuji have just one color reversal film available in 16mm, and I'm not even sure about Fuji now.
  • 0


Paralinx LLC

Technodolly

Abel Cine

Rig Wheels Passport

Aerial Filmworks

Willys Widgets

rebotnix Technologies

FJS International, LLC

Opal

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Ritter Battery

CineTape

Tai Audio

Wooden Camera

Visual Products

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Metropolis Post

CineLab

The Slider

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Glidecam

Wooden Camera

Opal

FJS International, LLC

CineLab

CineTape

Metropolis Post

Aerial Filmworks

Glidecam

rebotnix Technologies

Technodolly

Rig Wheels Passport

The Slider

Abel Cine

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Visual Products

Ritter Battery

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Paralinx LLC

Willys Widgets

Tai Audio