Jump to content


Photo

A quick question....


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Nadav Hekselman

Nadav Hekselman
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 68 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 12 March 2008 - 04:01 PM

I dont have time to test this, and was wondering, does anyone know which gives more F-stop(lux - whatever) from lets say 1.5 meters distance:

a Bounced Redhead of a white foam, with a full CTB , or a short daylight 4-bank kinoflo?

thanks ..



Nadav Hekselman
  • 0

#2 Scott Imler

Scott Imler
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 46 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 12 March 2008 - 10:30 PM

I dont have time to test this, and was wondering, does anyone know which gives more F-stop(lux - whatever) from lets say 1.5 meters distance:

a Bounced Redhead of a white foam, with a full CTB , or a short daylight 4-bank kinoflo?

thanks ..



Nadav Hekselman


Well Red heads come in 650 and 1 K so i am not sure which one you arer referring to. I would say that the KINO will be more efficient in that you can get it closer to the subject with out it being in the shot where as a bounce you have subject, light then bounce card . Its further away I also think the Kino is a nicer look.
  • 0

#3 Nadav Hekselman

Nadav Hekselman
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 68 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 13 March 2008 - 04:43 AM

Well Red heads come in 650 and 1 K...

i ment the 650k
  • 0

#4 Xavier Plaza

Xavier Plaza
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 288 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Guayaquil - Ecuador

Posted 13 March 2008 - 10:38 AM

I guess kino flo (obviously depends your the lamp wattage power), you're more direct soft light and you can use this light near to the subject don't produce heat like other tungsten light...
If you don't have time to test this you can always look in kino or arri website the photometric chart...

Xavier Plaza

Edited by Xavier Plaza, 13 March 2008 - 10:40 AM.

  • 0

#5 Kevin Zanit

Kevin Zanit
  • Sustaining Members
  • 1223 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • LA

Posted 13 March 2008 - 05:28 PM

The Kino would do more damage, especially without the louver.

Kevin Zanit
  • 0

#6 Phil Gerke

Phil Gerke
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 59 posts
  • Sound Department

Posted 13 March 2008 - 09:47 PM

Please correct me if I am wrong in my thinking. Gelling that 650 full CTB would reduce it to around 100 watts and then bouncing that would really knock it down quite a bit, certainly less than your Kino. Sound right?

Phil
  • 0


New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Abel Cine

CineTape

CineLab

Visual Products

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

FJS International, LLC

Technodolly

Tai Audio

The Slider

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Glidecam

Wooden Camera

Rig Wheels Passport

Paralinx LLC

Aerial Filmworks

rebotnix Technologies

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Willys Widgets

Metropolis Post

Ritter Battery

rebotnix Technologies

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

FJS International, LLC

Willys Widgets

Glidecam

Paralinx LLC

Abel Cine

Rig Wheels Passport

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Aerial Filmworks

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Tai Audio

CineLab

Visual Products

Technodolly

Metropolis Post

CineTape

Wooden Camera

The Slider

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Ritter Battery