Jump to content


Photo

Shutter Island 65mm


  • Please log in to reply
51 replies to this topic

#1 Brian Rose

Brian Rose
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 896 posts
  • Student
  • Kansas City area

Posted 28 March 2008 - 10:30 AM

All,
I read over at www.in70mm.com that Scorsese was using 65mm to shoot "Shutter Island." The news blurb does not say to what extent, or if it's just for process/special effects that require larger negative. Does anyone know anything more concrete?

Whatever the case may be, this is awfully exciting. Dark Knight with Imax scenes, Samsara in 65 and now Scorsese? I wonder if there is a mini-resurgence? Now if we could just get theatres equipped for it!

Brian R.
  • 0

#2 georg lamshöft

georg lamshöft
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 310 posts
  • Berlin

Posted 11 June 2009 - 03:07 AM

Trailer is online!
  • 0

#3 K Borowski

K Borowski
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3905 posts
  • Camera Operator
  • I.A.T.S.E. Local # 600 Eastern Region

Posted 11 June 2009 - 07:53 AM

(Said to the tone of the police officers in the "Miss Stevenson & Ike" Southpark Episode)

nicee
  • 0

#4 Ricardo Diaz

Ricardo Diaz
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 43 posts
  • 2nd Assistant Camera
  • Los Angeles

Posted 11 June 2009 - 08:45 PM

Nolan and Pfister are at it again as well. They are testing 5perf 65mm for their new flick. I know this cause I saw the reels at technicolor last night and this morning. I would love to see a new film shot 65mm.
  • 0

#5 Ravi Kiran

Ravi Kiran
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 139 posts
  • Other
  • Los Angeles

Posted 25 January 2010 - 08:13 PM

What kind of things are they shooting in 65mm? If its something besides VFX plates, what is the benefit?
  • 0

#6 Chris Burke

Chris Burke
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1675 posts
  • Boston, MA

Posted 01 February 2010 - 07:54 PM

What kind of things are they shooting in 65mm? If its something besides VFX plates, what is the benefit?




watch the film Baraka. That is benefit.
  • 0

#7 K Borowski

K Borowski
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3905 posts
  • Camera Operator
  • I.A.T.S.E. Local # 600 Eastern Region

Posted 02 February 2010 - 09:13 AM

What benefit?

How about having practically no grain?


Even scope can look kinda grainy if you are shooting the 500T stocks and there are lots of highlights or even tones.
  • 0

#8 Ravi Kiran

Ravi Kiran
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 139 posts
  • Other
  • Los Angeles

Posted 02 February 2010 - 11:44 AM

What benefit?

How about having practically no grain?


Even scope can look kinda grainy if you are shooting the 500T stocks and there are lots of highlights or even tones.


So I assume that benefit stays even when going down to 35mm? Would going to 35mm via DI be better than reducing it optically? Are there certain kinds of shots they're using 65mm on that would benefit more?

If 4K projection is going to become the norm, do you think we'll more of these kinds of films that at least use 65mm for some scenes?
  • 0

#9 K Borowski

K Borowski
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3905 posts
  • Camera Operator
  • I.A.T.S.E. Local # 600 Eastern Region

Posted 03 February 2010 - 01:01 PM

I just saw the trailer in the theatre the other day, and none of the shots in it said "65" to me.


Eh, with 2K DLP and 2K DIs being ubiquitous in the theatres, and IMAX :-/ there is almost no point to shooting 65mm in the near-term. Only film projection can resolve 4K unless you are in one of the handful of facilities with Sony 4K projectors in the world.


Of course, I guess I could be pleasantly surprised because "Shutter Island" has opted for a 4K DI and only the trailer was done in 2K. . .
  • 0

#10 Thomas James

Thomas James
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 844 posts
  • Camera Operator

Posted 03 February 2010 - 01:35 PM

The theatre chains like AMC are in the process of installing thousands of 4K digital projectors. Once these projectors are installed the theatre owners are going to be screaming for the 4K content that only 65mm film origination can deliver. 35mm film might be good enough for 2K digital projection or Blu-Ray but it will not be good enough to really take advantage of the splendor of 4K digital projection. Of course a lot of film makers will try to uprezz their 35mm footage with a 4K digital scan and hope that nobody can tell the difference but this really defeats the purpose of 4K which is to showcase 65mm Cinematography.
  • 0

#11 K Borowski

K Borowski
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3905 posts
  • Camera Operator
  • I.A.T.S.E. Local # 600 Eastern Region

Posted 03 February 2010 - 01:57 PM

AMC here still has slide projectors.


AMC, Regal, and Cinemark were supposed to be all digital by June of this year. Whoops!

If you are reading any press releases regarding digital projection that were made before Fall 2008, best to throw them out; they were made before the economy collapsed.
  • 0

#12 Stephen Murphy

Stephen Murphy
  • Guests

Posted 03 February 2010 - 04:47 PM

the 4K content that only 65mm film origination can deliver. 35mm film might be good enough for 2K digital projection or Blu-Ray but it will not be good enough to really take advantage of the splendor of 4K digital projection.


Are you on crack?
  • 0

#13 K Borowski

K Borowski
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3905 posts
  • Camera Operator
  • I.A.T.S.E. Local # 600 Eastern Region

Posted 03 February 2010 - 05:02 PM

Maybe, but, better question: Doesn't he have his own personal off-topic thread?


As usual, he is off topic. Oh, hey, BTW, Thomas, looks like nuclear explosions, on or off the ground, got banned the other day by our nation's president. I voted for the a$$h0le and he wants us to launch more probes, and didn't get his key agenda, public healthcare accomplished.

So maybe next time I am in town, I will take a hit with you. :-/

Edited by Karl Borowski, 03 February 2010 - 05:02 PM.

  • 0

#14 Thomas James

Thomas James
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 844 posts
  • Camera Operator

Posted 05 February 2010 - 01:25 PM

I would think that one would have to be a narrow minded individual to think that I am off topic but rather I think that you are merely disagreeing with what I say and trying to come up with excuses. The fact is that whenever 4K digital projection is showcased in comparison with 2K footage, movies made with 65mm film origination are always used so the differences in picture quality are made more readily apparant in order to justify to the theatre owner the reason why he should invest in a 4K system. However we had the same problem with IMAX when theatre owners invested heavily in the construction of IMAX theatres and then were left holding the bag when they had to wait 20 years for the first IMAX movie to be produced. For this reason 5 perf 65mm film is a much more practical format because it is much better quality than 35mm film yet it does not break the bank like 15 perf IMAX.
  • 0

#15 Thomas James

Thomas James
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 844 posts
  • Camera Operator

Posted 05 February 2010 - 01:28 PM

As far as the economy collapsing doesn't it make much more economic sense to go with digital projection rather than having to keep buying 35mm prints?
  • 0

#16 K Borowski

K Borowski
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3905 posts
  • Camera Operator
  • I.A.T.S.E. Local # 600 Eastern Region

Posted 05 February 2010 - 03:03 PM

Not at $80,000 a digital projector. Even with digital print fees, that is a lot of lost ground that a theatre doesn't otherwise have to pay.

Oh, and, BTW, 2K projectors are already obsolete and digital projectors still cost a metric $h it-tonne.
  • 0

#17 Thomas James

Thomas James
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 844 posts
  • Camera Operator

Posted 05 February 2010 - 04:33 PM

Actually dual 2K projectors will give the 2K format additional life and may be a compelling alternative to 4K if theatre owners are worried about tough economic times yet wan't the best quality they can afford. Since dual 2K projector systems will bear the IMAX name I think theatre owners are going to expect something better than 4 perf 35mm film origination.
  • 0

#18 Antti Näyhä

Antti Näyhä
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 153 posts
  • Other
  • Belgium/Finland

Posted 06 February 2010 - 04:22 AM

So I assume that benefit stays even when going down to 35mm? Would going to 35mm via DI be better than reducing it optically? Are there certain kinds of shots they're using 65mm on that would benefit more?

I saw "The International" last year in a really good 35mm projection. They used 65mm and VistaVision (with a 4k DI) for some shots, with the majority of the film being Super 35 (2k DI). 65mm was mostly used for wide cityscapes, where the extra detail and lack of grain really was a huge benefit.

Then again, I've seen some 65->35mm stuff (both photochemical and 4k DI) that didn't really look any sharper than straight 35mm. The blame was either on poor print quality or projection quality; perhaps both.

The trailer for "Shutter Island" that I saw looked pretty bad. Then again, trailer prints often do, and this one was letterboxed inside a 1.85:1 frame to make things worse... Generally, I don't think you should ever take the trailer as any sort of indication of the actual image quality of a film.

If 4K projection is going to become the norm, do you think we'll more of these kinds of films that at least use 65mm for some scenes?

One sure hopes so!
  • 0

#19 Chayse Irvin

Chayse Irvin
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 409 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles, CA

Posted 06 February 2010 - 04:50 AM

The idea of a 65mm neg scanned at 8k and projected 4k makes me droll.
  • 0

#20 Thomas James

Thomas James
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 844 posts
  • Camera Operator

Posted 07 February 2010 - 04:29 PM

When I was a kid 65mm was a mainstream format at least for Epic films. Nowadays you are considered off the wall and overkill for even suggesting that a movie should be filmed using 65mm. I hope with the advent of 4K digital projection that 65mm film aquisition will one day again become the mainstream format. The problem is that most Cinematographers feel that they are elitists just because they prefer film over video but I think it takes a lot more effort to be a true elitist. If any format is overkill it is the IMAX format which I think caused a lot of Cinematographers to become so discouraged by the costs that they just gave up on trying to shoot with 65mm film.
  • 0


Ritter Battery

Glidecam

Paralinx LLC

Visual Products

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Aerial Filmworks

Technodolly

Broadcast Solutions Inc

rebotnix Technologies

CineLab

Willys Widgets

The Slider

FJS International, LLC

CineTape

Rig Wheels Passport

Wooden Camera

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Opal

Tai Audio

Abel Cine

Metropolis Post

Opal

CineTape

Aerial Filmworks

Wooden Camera

CineLab

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Abel Cine

Metropolis Post

Technodolly

Ritter Battery

Tai Audio

Paralinx LLC

Glidecam

rebotnix Technologies

Willys Widgets

The Slider

Visual Products

Rig Wheels Passport

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

FJS International, LLC

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS