Jump to content


Photo

Coiled Cable vs. Empty Boom


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 Nick Norton

Nick Norton
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 248 posts
  • Student
  • Chicago

Posted 07 June 2008 - 04:43 AM

Trying to decide on a boom pole.

1st one, but i want it to be my last.

Was wondering what the real benefit of the internally coiled cable booms offered, other than convenience.

Anything to do with sound quality?


Also, if you were to get just the pole and separate xlr cable is the proper set up to just wind the cable around the extended boom to the recorder?


Thanks-

Nicholas
  • 0

#2 Daniel Sheehy

Daniel Sheehy
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 407 posts
  • Other
  • Brisbane

Posted 07 June 2008 - 06:42 PM

...Was wondering what the real benefit of the internally coiled cable booms offered, other than convenience.
Anything to do with sound quality?...

BIG plus for convenience, particularly with smaller crews where people have to multi task.

I am not aware of any quality issues, but having that cable coiled / run down the boom can be a real nuisance. Plus it is yet another place for stray noise to creep into the recording.. the sound of the cable rubbing against the boom pole.
  • 0

#3 Nick Norton

Nick Norton
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 248 posts
  • Student
  • Chicago

Posted 07 June 2008 - 09:18 PM

Well in that case i'm thinking of getting this k-tek pole.

http://www.bhphotovi...m_Boompole.html


Do you think 7.5' is long enough for a maximum length?


Thanks-

Nicholas
  • 0

#4 Tim Terner

Tim Terner
  • Sustaining Members
  • 340 posts
  • Producer
  • Prague, CZ

Posted 08 June 2008 - 01:15 AM

As Daniel said, a coiled cable is a big convenience. It's also a plus to have a side exit for the XLR, that one you linked to has a bottom exit. Length, nice and light at that length but theres going to come a time when you're going to need a lot longer pole
  • 0

#5 Nick Norton

Nick Norton
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 248 posts
  • Student
  • Chicago

Posted 08 June 2008 - 02:27 PM

Well if i go with the K-Tek KE89cc for now, and get the K-SM shock mount linked here:

(http://www.bhphotovi...Shockmount.html)

and then the windshield adapter linked here:

(http://www.bhphotovi...r_Acessory.html)




Should i be good as far as having a reliable mount/ windshield setup to last me for a while?

I'd hate to buy a fishpole and then realize i need to upgrade in a short amount of time... and since i know nothing of poles/mounts i'm coming to you guys for help.

Last thing, is a mount compatible with most mics if it accepts mics 19 to 25mm in diameter?



Thanks again-

Nicholas
  • 0

#6 Bernhard Zitz

Bernhard Zitz
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 342 posts
  • Other
  • Z├╝rich, Switzerland

Posted 09 June 2008 - 06:57 AM

Was wondering what the real benefit of the internally coiled cable booms offered, other than convenience.


It's convenient to have a coiled cable boom. BUT at maximum length when the cable inside gets stretched, sometimes it swings inside the boom and hits the border, what produces ugly noises in fast movements.

A compromise is to let the back of the boom open and run a regular cable inside. Then you still have to rewind some spare length but you don't have to wind it around the boom.

With a little practice you'll handle a classic boom with outside cable nearly as fast as a boom with inside coil. I have done lots of fast jobs (ENG, Documentary etc.) with the classic set up and never had real problems. There are these rare moments when you're just one soundguy and your spare cable curls in a bizarre way around your feet, they say "action!" and you beg for something more convenient.

cheers, Bernhard
  • 0

#7 Chris Keth

Chris Keth
  • Sustaining Members
  • 4427 posts
  • 1st Assistant Camera
  • Los Angeles

Posted 10 June 2008 - 01:47 AM

Do you think 7.5' is long enough for a maximum length?


Thanks-

Nicholas


I would say 7.5 feet isn't even close to long enough, if it's your only boompole. Once you get a grip on the thing you're barely 5 feet from the action. The DP will curse you every day (whether silently or not depends on the DP;)) if he can't shoot wide shots.
  • 0

#8 Steve McBride

Steve McBride
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 239 posts
  • 1st Assistant Camera
  • New York, NY

Posted 22 June 2008 - 03:36 PM

It really depends on your operator, if you're doing it go with what you're comfortable with, if someone else is going to be doing it check with them.

And yeah, with what Chris said, 7.5' is no where near long enough for a maximum length. Try to atleast double that if you can.
  • 0


Glidecam

Paralinx LLC

Wooden Camera

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Aerial Filmworks

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Metropolis Post

CineTape

Tai Audio

Ritter Battery

The Slider

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

rebotnix Technologies

Technodolly

Visual Products

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

FJS International, LLC

Rig Wheels Passport

Abel Cine

CineLab

Willys Widgets

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Metropolis Post

Paralinx LLC

Rig Wheels Passport

Wooden Camera

CineTape

Glidecam

Abel Cine

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Tai Audio

CineLab

The Slider

Technodolly

rebotnix Technologies

Ritter Battery

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Willys Widgets

Aerial Filmworks

FJS International, LLC

Visual Products