Jump to content


Photo

Princes in CinemaScope


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 John Young

John Young
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 181 posts
  • Other
  • Lexington, KY

Posted 06 August 2008 - 08:41 AM

So last night I went to see Prince Caspian. And while I thought the picture show its self was good, there were some things that distracted me.

First of, I had read somewhere recently that houses with only one projector would sometimes run scope and flat trailers at the head of the film. The theatre I went to last night (second run A-films for $1.50 yay) did this. However Caspian was an CinemaScope film. I could only tell when the sun shon in brightly enough to cause the classic anamorphic light artifact.

The question I have is: Why did some trailers show flat (but not streeeeetched) in a 4:3 with black bars on the side AR, and the actual scope trailers filled the screen (which was curved oddly enough*)

If you show a flat picture through an anamorphic lens, does it not get stretched out?

I do know there was no one in the projection booth, because there was no lens change between spots. There was a brief adjustment of the gate, and that was it. I also know that whoever assembled this film did a horrid job. There was even a 1/2 frame splice, which made everyone jump when the loud POP from the accompanying sound track cut through the very solemn sequence. That's about enough ranting.


Any thoughts?

JRY

*I think I recall that anamorphic pictures should be shown on a curved screen. I remark that this theatre had a curved screen at all because it is a second run house and was (as far as I know) never built to run first releases. It is only about 1/2 a mile from the 16 screen Regal (my [overpriced] favorite). Perhaps the builders had some sense...
  • 0

#2 Max Jacoby

Max Jacoby
  • Sustaining Members
  • 2955 posts
  • Other

Posted 06 August 2008 - 08:56 AM

Narina was shot Super 35mm, not anamorphic.
  • 0

#3 John Young

John Young
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 181 posts
  • Other
  • Lexington, KY

Posted 06 August 2008 - 09:09 AM

Super 35.... I'm ok with that, but what about the horizontal lens flairs? Can you get a flair like that with a spherical lens?
  • 0

#4 Max Jacoby

Max Jacoby
  • Sustaining Members
  • 2955 posts
  • Other

Posted 06 August 2008 - 09:26 AM

They probably added them in post. Fincher does that quite a lot.
  • 0

#5 Phil Rhodes

Phil Rhodes
  • Sustaining Members
  • 11939 posts
  • Other

Posted 06 August 2008 - 11:49 AM

And hey, scope screens are supposed to be curved.

P
  • 0

#6 John Holland

John Holland
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2248 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • London England

Posted 06 August 2008 - 12:08 PM

Curved maybe one in some American cinema in 1954 . Cinerama ,D150 -Todd AO yes thats about it.
  • 0

#7 Leo Anthony Vale

Leo Anthony Vale
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2010 posts
  • Other
  • Pittsburgh PA

Posted 06 August 2008 - 02:21 PM

The question I have is: Why did some trailers show flat (but not streeeeetched) in a 4:3 with black bars on the side AR, and the actual scope trailers filled the screen (which was curved oddly enough*)

If you show a flat picture through an anamorphic lens, does it not get stretched out?


The trick is to print squeezed trailers of non-widescreen movies.
The picture doesn't fill the entire width of the Scope frame. Though it probably is a 1.85:1 image instead of 1.37:1, which is still considered widescreen.
  • 0

#8 John Young

John Young
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 181 posts
  • Other
  • Lexington, KY

Posted 07 August 2008 - 09:59 AM

The trick is to print squeezed trailers of non-widescreen movies.
The picture doesn't fill the entire width of the Scope frame. Though it probably is a 1.85:1 image instead of 1.37:1, which is still considered widescreen.


So what your saying is that the 'scope' trailers were shone through an anamorphic lense (or something) and the flat trailers were actually squeezed, then unsqueezed to look 4:3?

OR they were really masked like that in the camera and the 4:3 ones were full frame but not wide screen (hence the black bars?)
  • 0

#9 Leo Anthony Vale

Leo Anthony Vale
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2010 posts
  • Other
  • Pittsburgh PA

Posted 07 August 2008 - 04:27 PM

So what your saying is that the 'scope' trailers were shone through an anamorphic lense (or something) and the flat trailers were actually squeezed, then unsqueezed to look 4:3?


The lab prints two batches of the trailer or commercial. The lab I worked at usually printed commercials for theatres. One batch is flat, the other has been printed from an optically squeezed dupe negative.
  • 0


Broadcast Solutions Inc

Glidecam

rebotnix Technologies

Rig Wheels Passport

Abel Cine

Paralinx LLC

FJS International, LLC

Tai Audio

Metropolis Post

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Ritter Battery

Aerial Filmworks

Visual Products

CineTape

Opal

Willys Widgets

CineLab

The Slider

Wooden Camera

Technodolly

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Paralinx LLC

FJS International, LLC

rebotnix Technologies

Abel Cine

Wooden Camera

Tai Audio

Ritter Battery

Glidecam

Visual Products

Rig Wheels Passport

The Slider

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Metropolis Post

Willys Widgets

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Aerial Filmworks

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Opal

CineLab

Technodolly

CineTape