Keeping in mind that the term "film" does not restrict itself to any format (could be any size negative) and digital video could be any size resolution/ data rate.
How do you think working with film compares to working with digital video, in respects to budget, pre-production, production, post-production, delivery and the final aesthetic, even archival- anything you can think of. How would might it affect a cinematographer and crew differently? Does it change your emotions or have an impact on your perceived artistic ability? Why would you choose one over the other?
This could be any type of project from a $200 million studio film to a one-man-band doc without power in an African jungle.
I can think of many pro's and con's on both sides- just from an equipment point of view, but I know there are so many things I haven't considered.
Care to share your take on the subject?
Edited by hunter richards, 06 November 2008 - 06:42 PM.