Jump to content


Photo

Shooting on 200T with Canon 1014


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Paul Beard

Paul Beard

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 21 December 2008 - 05:44 PM

I am going to be shooting a wedding on my Canon 1014 Super 8. I've done some tests with 64T and it looks good.

However we decided to shoot on Kodak 200T for this wedding, however upon reading the manual I found that the camera originally only recognizes 16, 25, 40, 64, 100, 160, 250 and 400.

Any help and advice much appreciated.
  • 0

#2 Rick Palidwor

Rick Palidwor
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 407 posts
  • Director

Posted 22 December 2008 - 12:43 AM

I am going to be shooting a wedding on my Canon 1014 Super 8. I've done some tests with 64T and it looks good.

However we decided to shoot on Kodak 200T for this wedding, however upon reading the manual I found that the camera originally only recognizes 16, 25, 40, 64, 100, 160, 250 and 400.

Any help and advice much appreciated.


Most likely the camera will recognize it as either 160 or 250, resulting in a slight under or over exposure, but either way negative has enough latitude that you'll be fine.
Rick
  • 0

#3 Paul Beard

Paul Beard

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 22 December 2008 - 05:14 AM

I am going to be shooting a wedding on my Canon 1014 Super 8. I've done some tests with 64T and it looks good.

However we decided to shoot on Kodak 200T for this wedding, however upon reading the manual I found that the camera originally only recognizes 16, 25, 40, 64, 100, 160, 250 and 400.

Any help and advice much appreciated.


Many thanks, be nice to know which! Anyone?
  • 0

#4 Paul Beard

Paul Beard

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 22 December 2008 - 05:22 AM

Many thanks, be nice to know which! Anyone?


found this:

http://www.kodak.com...s/faq2107.shtml
  • 0

#5 Yang Liu

Yang Liu

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 9 posts
  • Camera Operator

Posted 28 December 2008 - 11:02 AM

Many thanks, be nice to know which! Anyone?


How about the 500T?
  • 0

#6 Rick Palidwor

Rick Palidwor
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 407 posts
  • Director

Posted 28 December 2008 - 03:44 PM

How about the 500T?


On that camera 500 would be recognized as 400, resulting in a quarter stop over-exposure: negligible with negative and it's not a bad idea to over-expose negative a little.
Rick
  • 0

#7 Yang Liu

Yang Liu

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 9 posts
  • Camera Operator

Posted 29 December 2008 - 09:59 AM

On that camera 500 would be recognized as 400, resulting in a quarter stop over-exposure: negligible with negative and it's not a bad idea to over-expose negative a little.
Rick


i see,,thank you.
  • 0


rebotnix Technologies

Ritter Battery

Opal

Rig Wheels Passport

Aerial Filmworks

Visual Products

Tai Audio

CineLab

Abel Cine

Paralinx LLC

CineTape

Metropolis Post

Wooden Camera

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

The Slider

FJS International, LLC

Willys Widgets

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Technodolly

Glidecam

Abel Cine

Ritter Battery

Aerial Filmworks

CineTape

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Opal

Metropolis Post

The Slider

Willys Widgets

FJS International, LLC

Rig Wheels Passport

CineLab

Wooden Camera

Paralinx LLC

Technodolly

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Visual Products

rebotnix Technologies

Tai Audio

Glidecam