Posted 25 January 2009 - 08:17 PM
I'm curious if anybody knows of any articles written about the film, in AC, ICG or anywhere else. I'd love to read more about it, any Slawomir Idziak interviews would be appreciated as well. I just put the "Double Life of Veronique" in my Netflix queue, so hopefully there's some extras on that to check out. Thanks for the help!
Posted 26 January 2009 - 09:27 PM
From what I can gleam, it was shot 35mm anamorphic (which you already know) and the mag tape I saw in the behind-the-scenes trailer is blue.
I'd assume they'd have shot a lot of it on EXR 5245, and EXR 500T, forget the number '98?
The film seems to have a distinct blue-green pallette, with the exception of the outdoor scenes, which are decidedly orange, so either they used some warming filters or timed it that way, though I'd think it'd be the former.
I really wish I could see this film on Blu-ray, as I missed it when it was out in theatres. It is one of my favorite recent Sci-Fi films, though it didn't really do that well in its theatrical run surprisingly.
I also remember the film being quite contrasty and dark, but I don't think anything like a bleach bypass was used. Both in art and wardrobe design, it was clearly going for the film noir look, so it seems to be have a lot more hard light than your typical '90s film.
I also saw one shot where they had a green towel up (didn't look like a green screen shot though) so perhaps they were trying to throw in some greenish fill with this too.
Sorry to have so little facts and so much speculation. BTW, where'd you pick up the Blu-ray of this? I'd definitely like to add it to my collection.
Posted 26 January 2009 - 10:04 PM
Karl, I'm curious what makes you think the movie is shot in anamorphic? I don't remember any specifically anamorphic artifacts but maybe I'm missing them. I was actually thinking it looked like Super 35, but then "Crimson Tide" fooled me into thinking it was S35 for about half the movie. The very brief behind-the-scenes doc on the disc had them using what looked like a Moviecam, so I guess I expected it not to be anamorphic because it wasn't Panavision (not that it necessarily rules anamorphic out).
Posted 28 January 2009 - 06:03 AM
Posted 28 January 2009 - 07:35 AM
Anyone have any further info on the film? I am curious now myself. . .
Posted 28 January 2009 - 05:32 PM
"Gattaca" was shot in Super 35 using spherical lenses. The bokeh has a hexagonal shape, so that rules out Zeiss lenses and since they didn't use Panavision equipment, I bet Slawomir Idziak used some old Cooke Speed Panchro prime lenses. I'd put my money on Kodak 5298 (500T) as the main stock for nights and interiors and 5293 (200T) for day exterior work. Idziak usually needs fast stocks for his heavy grads.
Overall, the BD is quite soft and a bit grainy at times for a 1998 film.
Posted 28 January 2009 - 07:26 PM