Thoughts on Rachel Getting Married
Posted 03 March 2009 - 03:17 PM
Posted 03 March 2009 - 03:45 PM
Posted 03 March 2009 - 04:13 PM
I thought this was one of the most pretentious films ive ever seen. And the photography was so intrusive. Sorry:-) I would have thought the majority was shot on something like a Sony Z7 or similar - certainly didnt look like F900 or HDcam to me.
I actually thought the film was shot on HDV witht he canon xah1's you can see spotted through the film, I had to go find out on IMDb-Pro that it was shot on an F900. The thing is, I think that was the point, to be intrusive, to put you in the moment, I thought it was daring. Although if you notice, most of the close ups were shot from affar zooming in. This of course gives you better DOP but, its not like the camera was right in the actor's faces, even though the shots were.
Posted 01 June 2009 - 04:23 AM
The acting is simply brilliant, and makes me remember how good Deborah Winger was/is.
My only complaint is with the sound. At times it was just hard to decipher what was being said and it sounded like they used outdoor/soundstage mics in indoor locations, which will cause a lot of room reverb.
But this film is exellent, IMHO.
Posted 02 June 2009 - 04:34 PM
Perhaps it improved later.
Posted 02 June 2009 - 07:37 PM