Jump to content


Photo

Canon D5 Mark II


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Pedro Millan

Pedro Millan
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 43 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 27 March 2009 - 11:37 PM

Hi guys,

I would love to hear some of your impressions about the new Canon D5 Mark II. I am about to work with a director that wants to shoot 16mm mixed with some Canon D5's footage.
Any thoughts? Lenses?

thanks!

p.
  • 0

#2 John Sprung

John Sprung
  • Sustaining Members
  • 4635 posts
  • Other

Posted 30 March 2009 - 10:51 AM

Click on "Back" and look at the list of subforums at the top. There's one for Canon that has lots of info on the 5D2. It's about two thirds of the way down the list.



-- J.S.
  • 0

#3 Steve Zimmerman

Steve Zimmerman
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 196 posts
  • Other
  • Charleston, SC USA

Posted 30 March 2009 - 12:38 PM

Trailer for the first feature shot on a dSLR
http://www.engadgeth...shot-on-a-dslr/

Rumor that Canon is creating their own RED type pro camera.
http://www.canonrumo...-camera-system/

Film still rules, but can't wait until there's an affordable digital camera with a PL mount for using my Lomo Anamorphics :rolleyes:
  • 0

#4 Steve Zimmerman

Steve Zimmerman
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 196 posts
  • Other
  • Charleston, SC USA

Posted 30 March 2009 - 03:05 PM

Oops! It's actually it's not a feature yet...
http://i.gizmodo.com...ous-workarounds
  • 0

#5 Phil Rhodes

Phil Rhodes
  • Sustaining Members
  • 11943 posts
  • Other

Posted 30 March 2009 - 03:58 PM

I spent the last two days shooting with one.

The pictures are quite nice. Focus is murder; you don't actively want a sensor this big, even if you think you do. It gets noisy, unpleasant vertical bands of noise, if you leave it on too long, which is mentioned in the manual. It's very low noise to begin with; then becomes very high noise over the next hour or so. The compression is awful; it's possible to do much better than it does in 40mbps h.264. Of course the best thing about it compared to something like Red is that it fires up almost instantly and then actually works reliably and for a long time on its tiny internal battery.

Depending where you are, you could go and see South London Filter who have manual Canon lens sets originally intended for use with their spinny-ground-glass adaptors, which would knock on the head a lot of the more obvious issues.

The lacking features in this thing are so obvious that I could well believe they're doing it for political reasons, but I've heard a couple of conflicting rumours about their intentions. Obviously it has the potential to be unutterably fantastic, and they clearly have the technological ability to produce a world-beating D-cinema camera at more or less any time they choose. It's just a matter of when and if they choose to do it, and I wouldn't be bowled over to find they've got something fun at NAB.

P
  • 0


CineTape

FJS International, LLC

Glidecam

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Tai Audio

Metropolis Post

Wooden Camera

The Slider

Willys Widgets

Visual Products

Aerial Filmworks

Abel Cine

Opal

Technodolly

Rig Wheels Passport

CineLab

rebotnix Technologies

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Paralinx LLC

Ritter Battery

Broadcast Solutions Inc

rebotnix Technologies

Visual Products

Metropolis Post

CineTape

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Aerial Filmworks

Ritter Battery

FJS International, LLC

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Tai Audio

CineLab

Abel Cine

Paralinx LLC

Wooden Camera

Technodolly

Willys Widgets

Glidecam

The Slider

Rig Wheels Passport

Opal