Jump to content


Photo

Filtering vs Grading


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 Edgar Dubrovskiy

Edgar Dubrovskiy
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 348 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • London

Posted 13 May 2009 - 05:09 PM

Hi!

Shooting a short in June.
Currently in full-on pre-production.
While doing research on stocks, realised I left an important question unanswered.

Shooting tunsgten stock, I want the picture to have a bit of a 'coldness'.
But will not do it through lighting.
Would you suggest a. using filter at all times, b. leaving it to grading?

The factors that may influence the decision:
most probably shooting fairly slow stock - 100 or 200. as well as will be overexposing by 2/3 already, to get less grain.
looking for the tightest grain possible.
the key light sources at most of the times will be HMIs.
will go through grading process after the picture is locked at post-production stage anyway - to even out the shots etc.

Thanks a lot in advance!
  • 0

#2 Scott Fritzshall

Scott Fritzshall
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 584 posts
  • Other
  • Los Angeles

Posted 13 May 2009 - 05:48 PM

Uh, why won't you do it through lighting? That's pretty much what lighting is for.
  • 0

#3 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 20072 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 13 May 2009 - 05:55 PM

If you are talking about taking a neutral image and doing an overall shift towards blue, that's pretty simple in post. Just shoot your grey card / scale at the head of the roll with a pale warming filter on, or lit with some slightly warmer light, and once they time that to neutral, the unfiltered footage that follows will be cooler.

Now if you were talking about using the RED camera and tungsten lights, I'd definitely say that you want to achieve blueness through HMI lights, filters, or gels rather than try to time a 3200K image to look more blue.

Of course remember that in daytime scenes on film, you can opt for shooting on tungsten stock and naturally having a lot of blue if you don't filter the image to get 3200K.
  • 0

#4 Edgar Dubrovskiy

Edgar Dubrovskiy
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 348 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • London

Posted 14 May 2009 - 11:37 AM

Uh, why won't you do it through lighting? That's pretty much what lighting is for.


It's more of a situational question, really.
I mean my question is more: if NOT correcting the colour with lighting - would you rather do it with filters on lens, or in post?
  • 0

#5 Edgar Dubrovskiy

Edgar Dubrovskiy
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 348 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • London

Posted 14 May 2009 - 11:40 AM

If you are talking about taking a neutral image and doing an overall shift towards blue, that's pretty simple in post. Just shoot your grey card / scale at the head of the roll with a pale warming filter on, or lit with some slightly warmer light, and once they time that to neutral, the unfiltered footage that follows will be cooler.


Thanks David!
If image quality and grain size are main priorities, would you say you would prefer to do this kind of shift in post rather than doing it with filters?
  • 0

#6 Chris Burke

Chris Burke
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1720 posts
  • Boston, MA

Posted 14 May 2009 - 11:58 AM

Thanks David!
If image quality and grain size are main priorities, would you say you would prefer to do this kind of shift in post rather than doing it with filters?



I'd say that doing it with filters will achieve a better look, most of the time, but you are married to that look. Where as with post you have a multitude of choices. Timing with a warming filter first as David suggested is a great way for an overall shift.
  • 0

#7 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 20072 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 14 May 2009 - 09:45 PM

Thanks David!
If image quality and grain size are main priorities, would you say you would prefer to do this kind of shift in post rather than doing it with filters?


Depends on the degree of shift you need. A minor shift, I'd rather not put an extra piece of glass in front of the lens for a minor correction. But as I said, it depends on what camera you're talking about because the RED benefits from a blue filters in tungsten light.
  • 0

#8 Edgar Dubrovskiy

Edgar Dubrovskiy
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 348 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • London

Posted 15 May 2009 - 12:13 PM

Depends on the degree of shift you need. A minor shift, I'd rather not put an extra piece of glass in front of the lens for a minor correction. But as I said, it depends on what camera you're talking about because the RED benefits from a blue filters in tungsten light.


We will be shooting 16mm.
Yes, I'm talking about very subtle, minor shift.
So, I guess 'post' is the way, in the end of the day.
  • 0


Metropolis Post

FJS International, LLC

Tai Audio

CineTape

The Slider

Rig Wheels Passport

Abel Cine

Ritter Battery

Paralinx LLC

CineLab

Visual Products

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Willys Widgets

rebotnix Technologies

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Technodolly

Glidecam

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Aerial Filmworks

Wooden Camera

Metropolis Post

Ritter Battery

Tai Audio

Visual Products

Wooden Camera

CineLab

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

The Slider

Technodolly

Rig Wheels Passport

Aerial Filmworks

Paralinx LLC

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Glidecam

FJS International, LLC

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Willys Widgets

rebotnix Technologies

CineTape

Abel Cine