Jump to content


Photo

HPX3700: 24 frames or 23.98


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Aileen M Taylor

Aileen M Taylor
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 13 posts
  • 1st Assistant Camera
  • New York, NY

Posted 01 September 2009 - 07:46 PM

I'm about to start a shoot with the Panasonic 3700 "Varicam" and while looking at the manual today I saw that it can record in either 23.98 or 24fps. This is an MOS shoot, and staying in video format for post, so I feel like we should shoot 24fps...? Another question would be, is there is any advantage to using one frame rate over the other in terms of P2 record space? Thanks.
  • 0

#2 Gus Sacks

Gus Sacks
  • Sustaining Members
  • 287 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles, CA

Posted 01 September 2009 - 09:05 PM

I'm about to start a shoot with the Panasonic 3700 "Varicam" and while looking at the manual today I saw that it can record in either 23.98 or 24fps. This is an MOS shoot, and staying in video format for post, so I feel like we should shoot 24fps...? Another question would be, is there is any advantage to using one frame rate over the other in terms of P2 record space? Thanks.


Hey Aileen Taylor :) This wouldn't be for Skip would it? Small world if so.

Either way, if it's an MOS shoot, 24fps would be great. Typically we'll just do 23.98fps for sync sound.

I'm going to say it's pretty much insignificant, that minor a difference, as far as recording time...

Good luck.
  • 0

#3 Aileen M Taylor

Aileen M Taylor
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 13 posts
  • 1st Assistant Camera
  • New York, NY

Posted 01 September 2009 - 09:58 PM

Yes it is for Skip :) Thanks.
  • 0

#4 John Sprung

John Sprung
  • Sustaining Members
  • 4635 posts
  • Other

Posted 02 September 2009 - 01:03 AM

The only significant question is whether you need to feed an NTSC video village. In that case, go 23.976. For MOS, it doesn't matter which speed you shoot. For sync, in only matters that picture and sound are both on the same side of the "point zero zero" vs. "point nine something" divide. Typically, we do everything at 23.976.




-- J.S.
  • 0

#5 Satsuki Murashige

Satsuki Murashige
  • Sustaining Members
  • 3510 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • San Francisco, CA

Posted 02 September 2009 - 01:14 AM

This is an MOS shoot, and staying in video format for post, so I feel like we should shoot 24fps...?

I'd say keep your life simple and shoot at 23.976 since it will be less confusing for post. Also, if you're going to broadcast you'll probably need to deliver an NTSC 23.976 or 29.97 version anyway. Any savings in recording time will be negligible.
  • 0

#6 Aileen M Taylor

Aileen M Taylor
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 13 posts
  • 1st Assistant Camera
  • New York, NY

Posted 02 September 2009 - 04:49 AM

thanks everyone. I'll go with 23.98.
  • 0


CineTape

Ritter Battery

Technodolly

Visual Products

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Metropolis Post

Aerial Filmworks

Abel Cine

Broadcast Solutions Inc

CineLab

Rig Wheels Passport

Willys Widgets

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Paralinx LLC

Tai Audio

Wooden Camera

rebotnix Technologies

The Slider

Glidecam

FJS International, LLC

Tai Audio

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Willys Widgets

The Slider

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Glidecam

CineLab

Visual Products

Metropolis Post

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

rebotnix Technologies

CineTape

Technodolly

Aerial Filmworks

Ritter Battery

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Paralinx LLC

Wooden Camera

Rig Wheels Passport

Abel Cine

FJS International, LLC