Jump to content


Photo

B&W Reversal


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Patrick Barry

Patrick Barry
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 37 posts
  • Director
  • Jacksonville, FL

Posted 05 September 2009 - 09:15 PM

One more post and I'll be done~ :P

For our film we're shooting B&W Reversal (16mm) and planning an HD master as a final output. I had heard that reversal likes to be a little overexposed. Is that correct? I've shot reversal before but its been a while.

Thanks!
  • 0

#2 Charles MacDonald

Charles MacDonald
  • Sustaining Members
  • 1157 posts
  • Other
  • Stittsville Ontario Canada

Posted 05 September 2009 - 10:06 PM

One more post and I'll be done~ :P

For our film we're shooting B&W Reversal (16mm) and planning an HD master as a final output. I had heard that reversal likes to be a little overexposed.


too much exposure and you end up with clear film for your highlights. B&W reversal has very little latitude.
  • 0

#3 Satsuki Murashige

Satsuki Murashige
  • Sustaining Members
  • 3510 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • San Francisco, CA

Posted 06 September 2009 - 03:16 AM

I had heard that reversal likes to be a little overexposed. Is that correct?

Common wisdom says the opposite - reversal should be slightly underexposed (around 1/3 stop) for more density and to protect the highlights. Reversal behaves a lot like video - once the highlights blow out, they are gone. No detail left, just clear film. Basically, you should try your best to nail your exposures perfectly and keep all important detail within the tonal range of the film, like -2 to +1. Otherwise, you will lose detail in the shadows and highlights.
  • 0

#4 Paul Korver

Paul Korver
  • Sustaining Members
  • 154 posts
  • Other
  • Los Angeles

Posted 06 September 2009 - 05:34 AM

Hi Patrick,
I'm aware of the common knowledge of slightly overexposing neg and slightly underexposing reversal. But I have to say that I have a ton of experience shooting Tri-X 7266 16mm (one of my favorite stocks) and I really prefer the contrast I get when I overexpose by 1/2 stop. Yes I might be loosing a bit in the highlights but it just looks "right" to me with that stock... very contrasty. When the exposure is slightly under I find the image very flat. I would never shoot Tri-X if I wanted to preserve all the highlight/shadow detail btw. That's part of the beauty to me of B/W reversal.

Good luck!

-Paul
  • 0

#5 Patrick Barry

Patrick Barry
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 37 posts
  • Director
  • Jacksonville, FL

Posted 08 September 2009 - 07:19 AM

Thanks all for your replies! We're getting a few test rolls and I'll see how it comes out. I guess I was thinking of negative the whole time regarding the slight overexposure.
  • 0


rebotnix Technologies

Willys Widgets

FJS International, LLC

CineTape

Paralinx LLC

Aerial Filmworks

Glidecam

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Technodolly

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Visual Products

CineLab

Wooden Camera

Rig Wheels Passport

Abel Cine

Metropolis Post

The Slider

Tai Audio

Ritter Battery

Aerial Filmworks

rebotnix Technologies

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Tai Audio

Glidecam

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Ritter Battery

The Slider

Rig Wheels Passport

Technodolly

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Willys Widgets

CineTape

Metropolis Post

CineLab

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Paralinx LLC

Abel Cine

Wooden Camera

FJS International, LLC

Visual Products