Jump to content


Photo

1D Mark IV for video


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 Magnus OverRein

Magnus OverRein

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Norway

Posted 01 November 2009 - 09:32 AM

Would you buy the 1D Mark IV just for it's video capabilitys?
  • 0

#2 Peter J DeCrescenzo

Peter J DeCrescenzo
  • Sustaining Members
  • 620 posts
  • Camera Operator
  • Portland, OR, USA www.peterdv.com Blog: http://herefortheweather.wordpress.com/

Posted 01 November 2009 - 11:05 AM

Maybe, if I primarily needed to shoot in very low-light situations. As shown & discussed here:
http://www.cinematog...showtopic=41901

But only if using a relatively low-resolution "HD" video camera wasn't a problem. I haven't seen res chart tests shot with a Canon 1DM4 yet, but I suspect its res performance will be similar to the Canon 5DM2 & 7D and Panasonic GH1; e.g.: quite poor for a "HD" video camera: Only about 600-700 lines or so, and the Canons also produce unusually bad moire/alias artifacts. See:
http://www.dvxuser.c...ad.php?t=187503

For typical web video use, and for limited broadcast TV and projected work -- and only when a low-res (for HD) look is appropriate and acceptable -- these video-capable DSLRs can be great tools, especially given their relative low cost. When used with fast lenses, these cams can produce a clean shallow DOF look without the bulk and cost of traditional HD video cams & DOF adapters.

Because of their lower-than-average resolution capability compared to most HD cameras, DSLRs aren't appropriate for most productions. But for some projects they can be a perfect fit.

YMMV.
  • 0

#3 Magnus Over-Rein

Magnus Over-Rein
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts
  • Student

Posted 12 November 2009 - 07:19 AM

Maybe, if I primarily needed to shoot in very low-light situations. As shown & discussed here:
http://www.cinematog...showtopic=41901

But only if using a relatively low-resolution "HD" video camera wasn't a problem. I haven't seen res chart tests shot with a Canon 1DM4 yet, but I suspect its res performance will be similar to the Canon 5DM2 & 7D and Panasonic GH1; e.g.: quite poor for a "HD" video camera: Only about 600-700 lines or so, and the Canons also produce unusually bad moire/alias artifacts. See:
http://www.dvxuser.c...ad.php?t=187503

For typical web video use, and for limited broadcast TV and projected work -- and only when a low-res (for HD) look is appropriate and acceptable -- these video-capable DSLRs can be great tools, especially given their relative low cost. When used with fast lenses, these cams can produce a clean shallow DOF look without the bulk and cost of traditional HD video cams & DOF adapters.

Because of their lower-than-average resolution capability compared to most HD cameras, DSLRs aren't appropriate for most productions. But for some projects they can be a perfect fit.

YMMV.



Alright, thanks for the answer. I don't really know that much about resolutions. I thought 1080p resolution was 1080p resolution, but apparently not. I saw the Nocturne video, shot on the 1D Mark IV, and was quite impressed by it, so I thought maybe it could be a good substitute for HD cams in the same pricerange.
  • 0


Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Ritter Battery

Opal

Glidecam

Visual Products

Aerial Filmworks

Tai Audio

Broadcast Solutions Inc

rebotnix Technologies

CineTape

Willys Widgets

FJS International, LLC

Wooden Camera

Paralinx LLC

Metropolis Post

CineLab

The Slider

Rig Wheels Passport

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Technodolly

Abel Cine

Glidecam

Metropolis Post

Tai Audio

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Aerial Filmworks

Ritter Battery

The Slider

Abel Cine

CineTape

Rig Wheels Passport

Broadcast Solutions Inc

rebotnix Technologies

CineLab

Technodolly

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Visual Products

Wooden Camera

Willys Widgets

FJS International, LLC

Paralinx LLC

Opal