Jump to content


Photo

ASC awards 2010


  • Please log in to reply
34 replies to this topic

#1 Daniel Carruthers

Daniel Carruthers
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 334 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Canada

Posted 12 January 2010 - 05:19 PM

Well the ASC awards where just announced
heres the list

Nine
inglorious basterds
the white ribbon
Avatar
the hurtlocker

I was a little surprised Avatar got nominated?
I really enjoyed the film, but more than half the film is CGI
I really didnt think too much of the live action photography?
Anyways what are your thoughts?
  • 0

#2 Tom Lowe

Tom Lowe
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1211 posts
  • Director
  • somewhere worshipping Terrence Malick

Posted 12 January 2010 - 11:33 PM

Well the ASC awards where just announced
heres the list

Nine
inglorious basterds
the white ribbon
Avatar
the hurtlocker

I was a little surprised Avatar got nominated?
I really enjoyed the film, but more than half the film is CGI
I really didnt think too much of the live action photography?
Anyways what are your thoughts?


Probably the weakest year for cinematography in a very long time. I still have not seen The White Ribbon, though.
  • 0

#3 Shaan Aslam

Shaan Aslam
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 56 posts
  • Student

Posted 14 January 2010 - 08:50 PM

Probably the weakest year for cinematography in a very long time. I still have not seen The White Ribbon, though.


The White Ribbon is probably the best out of these, with Nine coming in at a close second, I think. Christian Berger, AAC really did a beautiful job on Ribbon. You should watch it as soon as possible.
  • 0

#4 Jon Rosenbloom

Jon Rosenbloom
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 713 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 14 January 2010 - 09:28 PM

Yeah, The White Ribbon's photography is amazingly precise.
  • 0

#5 K Borowski

K Borowski
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3905 posts
  • Camera Operator
  • I.A.T.S.E. Local # 600 Eastern Region

Posted 15 January 2010 - 08:40 PM

Saying that "Avatar" is only half CG is masterful understatement. Might as well nominate video games for the award, next :unsure:
  • 0

#6 Tom Jensen

Tom Jensen
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1234 posts
  • Camera Operator
  • Dallas, TX

Posted 15 January 2010 - 09:49 PM

Saying that "Avatar" is only half CG is masterful understatement. Might as well nominate video games for the award, next :unsure:


These aren't the People's Choice Awards and they aren't the TV Guide Awards. These guys were nominated by the ASC members. They must have seen something in this that was on the cutting edge of filmmaking or there was something that was in the cinematographer's contribution that led them to nominate this film. Jim Cameron is a master director who sticks his neck out there and makes movies that are not only box office successes but have a significant amount of artistic merit. We'll see if it wins but once the steam roller gets going, it's hard to stop.
  • 0

#7 Gus Sacks

Gus Sacks
  • Sustaining Members
  • 287 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles, CA

Posted 15 January 2010 - 11:17 PM

Well, Avatar just won the Critic's Choice Award for Cinematography and Art Direction among other technical awards...
  • 0

#8 Daniel Carruthers

Daniel Carruthers
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 334 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Canada

Posted 16 January 2010 - 12:40 AM

Saying that "Avatar" is only half CG is masterful understatement. Might as well nominate video games for the award, next :unsure:



Well you know with more and more films having CGI maybe there should be a 2nd category for best cinematography in a CGI film?
  • 0

#9 Jesse Lee Cairnie

Jesse Lee Cairnie
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 51 posts
  • Other

Posted 19 January 2010 - 02:06 PM

I dont disagree with any of the selections, all masters of the craft.. Congrats on Mauro he definitely deserves it, even if his Cinematography was but 30% of Avatar.. thats how good he is..

My only thing is Where the Wild Things Are.. How is that not on the list? Its boggling my mind.. thoughts please..
  • 0

#10 A. Whitehouse

A. Whitehouse
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 267 posts
  • Director
  • Melbourne

Posted 20 January 2010 - 01:24 AM

Probably the weakest year for cinematography in a very long time. I still have not seen The White Ribbon, though.


Its funny, but I couldn't disagree more. I thought these all looked great but I can think of a few I might have nominated as well. I would like to see Hurtlocker get some recognition.
Ive been a fan of Mauro Fiores for a long time though, I wouldn't be surprised if Avatar won.
  • 0

#11 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 19769 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 20 January 2010 - 01:48 AM

I can't say that I'm excited by any of my choices this year; they are all fine works of cinematography though. But this is nothing like the year of "Assassination of Jesse James", "There Will be Blood", and "No Country for Old Men".

My favorite five of the year for cinematography is (no particular order):

White Ribbon
Broken Embraces
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
Coco Before Chanel
Inglourious Basterds

My runners-up list would be:

Avatar, Star Trek, Young Victoria, State of Play, Up in the Air, The International, Tetro, Where the Wild Things Are, A Serious Man

Possible candidates that I haven't seen yet:
Amelia, AntiChrist, Bright Star, Cheri, The Hurt Locker, A Single Man

But I also wonder about nominating "Avatar", the percentage of live-action is small, and what's there was augmented by a lot of set extension, etc. If one is really rewarding it for an overall visual experience, one would have to toss in Vince Pace, James Cameron, Joe Letteri et al.

If "The Hurt Locker" gets an Oscar nomination for Best Cinematography, that would be the first Super-16 feature I can think of, unless you count "City of God", which was also nominated and was mostly shot in Super-16.
  • 0

#12 Daniel Smukalla

Daniel Smukalla

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Seoul, Korea

Posted 03 February 2010 - 08:32 AM

Avatar deserves a nomination for the revolutionary 3D cinematography used in it and how it will change the art and craft of cinematography. However, what was Vince Pace's role during the production of Avatar? Aside from helping to design the camera system, according to IMDB he is credited as Director of Photography: Los Angeles, not as a second unit DP.

Either way is it possible for two DPs to share a nomination?
  • 0

#13 Daniel Carruthers

Daniel Carruthers
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 334 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Canada

Posted 03 February 2010 - 10:48 AM

Avatar deserves a nomination for the revolutionary 3D cinematography used in it and how it will change the art and craft of cinematography. However, what was Vince Pace's role during the production of Avatar? Aside from helping to design the camera system, according to IMDB he is credited as Director of Photography: Los Angeles, not as a second unit DP.

Either way is it possible for two DPs to share a nomination?


last year Chris Menges and Roger deakins shared a nomination for the Reader
But both those DOP shot large portions of the film, and where under the main unit
Im not sure what Vince pace shot, but it probably wasn't much in the grand scheme of things?
otherwise Im sure they would of credited both Muro and vince together?
Also I enjoy 3D but I really dont think Aavatar changed the craft of cinematography?
most of what I found to be spectacular about the movie was the 3D CGI

Edited by Daniel Carruthers, 03 February 2010 - 10:50 AM.

  • 0

#14 Brian Rose

Brian Rose
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 896 posts
  • Student
  • Kansas City area

Posted 03 February 2010 - 02:29 PM

Has anyone heard anything about the Richard Moore Heritage Award? Have notifications gone out yet? I'm one of the nominees, so I'm really excited about this one (though I'd expect my chances are nill compared to all the guys who went to one of the big time schools). Thanks!

BR
  • 0

#15 Gus Sacks

Gus Sacks
  • Sustaining Members
  • 287 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles, CA

Posted 03 February 2010 - 08:32 PM

Has anyone heard anything about the Richard Moore Heritage Award? Have notifications gone out yet? I'm one of the nominees, so I'm really excited about this one (though I'd expect my chances are nill compared to all the guys who went to one of the big time schools). Thanks!

BR


Yeah... at least one of them went to my buddy Benji Bakshi at AFI. Not sure about the other one. Congrats either way for the nom.
  • 0

#16 Brian Rose

Brian Rose
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 896 posts
  • Student
  • Kansas City area

Posted 04 February 2010 - 09:18 AM

Yeah... at least one of them went to my buddy Benji Bakshi at AFI. Not sure about the other one. Congrats either way for the nom.


That answers my question. They must've been notified. Again, no surprise. My work is pretty hacky compared to the great work the big schools are making. But someday maybe I'll do something that's really worthwhile...someday.
  • 0

#17 Tom Lowe

Tom Lowe
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1211 posts
  • Director
  • somewhere worshipping Terrence Malick

Posted 08 February 2010 - 12:49 AM

I saw White Ribbon and thought it was a fine film, but ultimately (I know David disagrees with me!) I feel that the black & white DI was a bad move. I would rather have seen this film in color. The landscape and skin tones and colors of the people and surroundings would have been better suited to color, IMO.

I have to say that so far, I'd give the Oscar to "State of Play" this year. Unfortunately, the film came out so long ago that most people have forgotten that it's even eligible this year.
  • 0

#18 Brian Rose

Brian Rose
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 896 posts
  • Student
  • Kansas City area

Posted 08 February 2010 - 01:48 PM

I saw White Ribbon and thought it was a fine film, but ultimately (I know David disagrees with me!) I feel that the black & white DI was a bad move.


Ditto. Call me an old fogey (at the ripe age of 25), but doing a color to B/W DI just feels...like cheating to me. If you want color, shoot color, if you want monochrome, shoot monochrome.
  • 0

#19 XiaoSu Han

XiaoSu Han
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 162 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 08 February 2010 - 07:50 PM

I think that black and white suited "The White Ribbon" perfectly. It's Haneke after all!

Regarding the reasons for color stock (from a Q&A with Berger, transcribed by Emmanuel SUYS from cml). It's not a choice one can easily make I guess.

"The
film was shot in color for 3 reasons. First, the German broadcaster,
involved in the project, insisted on a color version of the film as an
eventuality. The existing B&W emulsions did not meet the requirements
needed. They wanted a newer B&W look, distance themselves from the
existing B&W films of the past. B&W filmstocks have not evolved as the
Colour ones. By combining the use of 5205, 5212 and 5219 with digital
post-production techniques (scanning-grading and some digital vfx)
Berger would be able to get the maximum of information in the original
negative, and so have at his disposal a large palette of colors to grade
from. This was needed not only to create this modern B&W look but also
it would allow Berger to work the indoor scenes with the strict minimum
lights or reflectors. Berger has a very peculiar way of lighting.
Haneke wanted especially the night scenes, if possible with no
additional lighting. Just a couple of chandeliers or petrol lamps In
some scenes the meter read-out in the highlights were around F 0.5.
The child coming down the staircase looking for his sister as a perfect
example. The night scenes were a constant on the edge shoot as far as
negative density was concerned. Color-temperature was at times way
below the 2800 K."
  • 0

#20 XiaoSu Han

XiaoSu Han
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 162 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 08 February 2010 - 07:58 PM

I've worked with Berger's lighting system and it's based around an accurately calculated parallel 1200W Par mounted on a crane and directed with several different mirrors onto bounceboards. - http://cine-rls.com/?t=videos - exposure on an outdated ISO 250 B&W stock would've been very tricky.
  • 0


Glidecam

Technodolly

Opal

Aerial Filmworks

Willys Widgets

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Abel Cine

Paralinx LLC

Broadcast Solutions Inc

The Slider

Rig Wheels Passport

Tai Audio

Visual Products

CineTape

Ritter Battery

Metropolis Post

CineLab

Wooden Camera

FJS International, LLC

rebotnix Technologies

CineLab

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Paralinx LLC

Aerial Filmworks

Abel Cine

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

FJS International, LLC

Technodolly

Wooden Camera

Willys Widgets

CineTape

Glidecam

Metropolis Post

Opal

Rig Wheels Passport

Tai Audio

rebotnix Technologies

Ritter Battery

The Slider

Visual Products