Jump to content


Photo

how is this done


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 Daniel Carruthers

Daniel Carruthers
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 334 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Canada

Posted 25 January 2010 - 01:30 PM

hey
just wondering how this might be done?
Im guessing its super long exposure times, maybe stop motion?
its a cool video with bugs at night
take a look

video
  • 0

#2 Daniel Carruthers

Daniel Carruthers
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 334 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Canada

Posted 25 January 2010 - 01:32 PM

hmm the link isnt working
try this

  • 0

#3 Matt Read

Matt Read
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 122 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles, CA

Posted 25 January 2010 - 03:56 PM

That's just a series of long exposures (maybe in the one to two second range) taken using an SLR or some other still camera that have been cut together.

In effect, it is much like stop motion, in that it is a series of still images shown in series. However, stop motion tries to create the illusion of smooth, realistic movement, whereas this video is much more stylized.
  • 0

#4 Saul Rodgar

Saul Rodgar
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1682 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 25 January 2010 - 10:30 PM

That's just a series of long exposures (maybe in the one to two second range) taken using an SLR or some other still camera that have been cut together.

In effect, it is much like stop motion, in that it is a series of still images shown in series. However, stop motion tries to create the illusion of smooth, realistic movement, whereas this video is much more stylized.


Yeah, it is a combination of both later in the video, sort of. IMHO, they should have picked a better part of that Telefon Tel Aviv song tho, like when the "melody" kicks in.
  • 0

#5 Jean Dodge

Jean Dodge
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 110 posts
  • Director

Posted 04 February 2010 - 09:40 PM

This is simply time lapse footage, from long exposures... longer than two seconds, I would say judging from the spirals visible from the possibly wounded bugs that are auguring in from high, creating the vertical spirals that span the full height of the frame. Maybe four to six seconds on some of the shots? The depth of field suggests that the long exposure time is compensated with a high f/stop.

There is a part toward the last where the camera pans SMOOTHLY up the telephone pole that seems like motion control, as well. The tilt up is gradual and controlled, in any case. Perhaps a geared head of some sort was employed, although it may be improvised from something simpler, and manipulated by hand between frames. A worm gear on a tilt plate would do the trick, if the operator remained vigilant and used a wrench to give the same measured turn after each shutter click.
  • 0

#6 Mike Lary

Mike Lary
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 472 posts
  • Other

Posted 04 February 2010 - 09:50 PM

just wondering how this might be done?
video


(from the discussion right below the video)
"I shot 156 pics at a 4 sec. exposure and edited them at 12 fps."
  • 0

#7 jacob thomas

jacob thomas
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 178 posts
  • Other

Posted 05 February 2010 - 02:48 AM

This is simply time lapse footage, from long exposures... longer than two seconds, I would say judging from the spirals visible from the possibly wounded bugs that are auguring in from high, creating the vertical spirals that span the full height of the frame. Maybe four to six seconds on some of the shots? The depth of field suggests that the long exposure time is compensated with a high f/stop.

There is a part toward the last where the camera pans SMOOTHLY up the telephone pole that seems like motion control, as well. The tilt up is gradual and controlled, in any case. Perhaps a geared head of some sort was employed, although it may be improvised from something simpler, and manipulated by hand between frames. A worm gear on a tilt plate would do the trick, if the operator remained vigilant and used a wrench to give the same measured turn after each shutter click.


Looks to me just like a post move. A high resolution dslr would have enough pixels.
  • 0

#8 Jean Dodge

Jean Dodge
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 110 posts
  • Director

Posted 05 February 2010 - 09:07 AM

Looks to me just like a post move. A high resolution dslr would have enough pixels.


You may be correct, or "grammatically correct" in that on second look I can see it is not a tilt, it is a rise. A move like that could be done with a tripod that has a geared riser column that is driven by a crank. Or, like you say it was done in post production by zooming in on a frame. I think it was done with a geared riser in camera, but I am biased because that's the way I'd do it....

A few months back I even sketched out a plan for a tall twin column riser made from nesting PVC pipe that would work with dripping water to lower a camera slowly for a time lapse move that isn't a pan or a tracking shot, and doesn't require electronic motion control. Haven't built it yet, though.

In any case it's a pretty cool video.
  • 0

#9 Paul Bruening

Paul Bruening

    (deceased)

  • Sustaining Members
  • 2858 posts
  • Producer
  • Oxford, Mississippi

Posted 05 February 2010 - 09:17 AM

In any case it's a pretty cool video.


Yes.
  • 0


CineLab

Glidecam

Opal

Wooden Camera

Willys Widgets

Broadcast Solutions Inc

FJS International, LLC

Ritter Battery

Tai Audio

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Visual Products

Paralinx LLC

Aerial Filmworks

Metropolis Post

Abel Cine

rebotnix Technologies

Technodolly

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Rig Wheels Passport

The Slider

CineTape

Opal

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

CineTape

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Technodolly

CineLab

FJS International, LLC

Tai Audio

Rig Wheels Passport

Paralinx LLC

Aerial Filmworks

Abel Cine

Ritter Battery

Visual Products

Wooden Camera

Metropolis Post

Willys Widgets

Glidecam

rebotnix Technologies

The Slider

Broadcast Solutions Inc